Staff Member
Gold Supporter
Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 23,294
- Reactions
- 111,614
Could the pouch and magazines be reproduction....yes of course.
Are there companies that make reproduction / copies of US Web Gear ...Yes again.
That said , most of the reproduction Web Gear are copies of WWII gear , not Korean War era gear.
The date on the pouch in the OP is 1951 , not conclusive proof of being actual GI issue...but leans towards it ...because as I said , most reproduction gear is WWII dated....
As for the lack of wear and tear....
As I said in my earlier post JQMD was a common maker of US Web Gear...how many thousands , if not millions of pouches did they make...?
Just how many did not get issued...? or issued to someone , who did not see a lot of "field time"...?
If you look around long enough and are lucky enough , you can still find excellent to like new pieces of US Web Gear.
Yes , the lack of wear and tear , can be a sign of the item being a reproduction...but ...
Without seeing the item in person , it can be difficult to tell for sure.
Andy
Are there companies that make reproduction / copies of US Web Gear ...Yes again.
That said , most of the reproduction Web Gear are copies of WWII gear , not Korean War era gear.
The date on the pouch in the OP is 1951 , not conclusive proof of being actual GI issue...but leans towards it ...because as I said , most reproduction gear is WWII dated....
As for the lack of wear and tear....
As I said in my earlier post JQMD was a common maker of US Web Gear...how many thousands , if not millions of pouches did they make...?
Just how many did not get issued...? or issued to someone , who did not see a lot of "field time"...?
If you look around long enough and are lucky enough , you can still find excellent to like new pieces of US Web Gear.
Yes , the lack of wear and tear , can be a sign of the item being a reproduction...but ...
Without seeing the item in person , it can be difficult to tell for sure.
Andy