National Kamala Harris has an extreme idea to get gun control legislation passed

[Stomper]

Here, that's all I got to say about that.... Kamala

 

[WoodsPlinker]

Her arguments are almost comical in rashly demonizing and shaming others into submission like a good little demogogue.

The difference is for the rational mind her words are good for nothing more then to attract flies and create a horrid smell.

 

[Ura-Ki]

Maybe its time for these politicians to experience the real world as it is reather then their glass enclosed utopian ideal! These people are so far removed from reality its amazing that they are allowed to run the country! What you and I are dealing with is the result of letting the inmates run the asylum!
Money, money, money!
These phucking megalomaniacs are bound and determined to destroy it all for money, power and control!

 

[drstrangelove]

Between her, Ortiz, Feinstein, Pelosi, and Schumer, they've got bugnuts crazy covered.

 

[dancinghippos]

PEople who ignore murder laws aren't going to obey gun laws.

MYTH: Police want stricter gun laws
TRUTH: Some police chiefs, mostly political appointees, may echo their big city mayors. But police on the street overwhelmingly support gun rights for citizens without police records. These are just three of many links:

https://www.quora.com/What-do-polic...ement-professionals-think-of-gun-control-laws

Police Gun Control Survey: Are legally-armed citizens the best solution to gun violence?

What do police officers think about gun control: National survey by PoliceOne tells all (Joe's Outdoor Office)

Google or DuckDuckGo (they don't track you) can find you more links to more surveys.

 

[cigars]

She won't last long. Notice that she got Willie Brown to come public about when he was blinking her and then gave her a plush job. They think it's a good strategy to get that little inconvenient tidbit out in front. It will haunt her character for her whole campaign.

 

[dancinghippos]

She won't last long. Notice that she got Willie Brown to come public about when he was blinking her and then gave her a plush job. They think it's a good strategy to get that little inconvenient tidbit out in front. It will haunt her character for her whole campaign.

Washington Post is already out there rationalizing and justifying her "private life". The nature of a scandal will not be allowed to conflict with the leftist narrative.

 

[nammac]

Washington Post is already out there rationalizing and justifying her "private life". The nature of a scandal will not be allowed to conflict with the leftist narrative.

This, unfortunately is the true reality. She'll be guilded and elevated... It's just the way the ruling class plays their games... Until one day We the People take their power away from them...

 

[nwslopoke]

Her arguments are almost comical in rashly demonizing and shaming others into submission like a good little demogogue.

She really believes she is a blessing to us all. She towed the California line and has been praised like a happy child, so much of course everyone would want to support her.

Her raise to prominence has been a production (as in Hollywood, fake). I would hope nationally, people would think, what did she just say? Those that think Trump has an ego problem better hold on to their hats. She is going to be next level when they test her on the national stage.

 

[notazombie]

Why is she so disgusted and angry about everything? Carrying around that colossal chip must be exhausting.

 

[Aero Denezol]

That woman can eat the nuts out of my

 

[Mooseman]

There is Case Law Rulings in several instances where it has been ruled " If law is Passed that is Unconstitutional , The PEOPLE are to IGNORE that law as it Has No Basis in fact".
Chief Justice John Marshall states:
"Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the Constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him and cannot be inspected by him?
If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe or to take this oath becomes equally a crime.
It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the Supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."
Chief Justice Marshall was correctly saying that, like everyone in government, those in the judicial branch, because of their "oath of office", have a required constitutional duty to examine and determine if their actions are constitutional or unconstitutional. To not so discharge their duties "is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime."
We also must remember that it is settled law that an unconstitutional "law" is not law.
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."
(16 Am. Jur. 2d, Section 177; later 2d, Section 256)
The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared." (PERRY v. UNITED STATES, 294 US 331, 353, (1934))
Therefore, the clear and unavoidable correct answer to the question - "Who can determine if a "Law" is unconstitutional?" is: each and everyone in government, who must do so before they act. This is a required solemn, constitutional duty according to their "oath of office" or the oath of their superior(s).
However, ultimately each individual Citizen has the sovereign power, duty and responsibility, always being responsible for their decision(s) and action(s), to determine what is unconstitutional. Some may say this will result in "total chaos and anarchy". No! It will once again result in freedom and liberty. Those in government must constantly be held accountable for their actions and/or lack of lawful actions.

 

[Ura-Ki]

As worrisome as this Braindead woman in pantsuit is, the one the really scares the chit outta me is Warren, the things she has planned if she gets the big chair aint gonna be good for anybody! Harris is bad juju to be sure, but Warren is much worse.
Combine that with the undead Nasty Nancy and her big gavel and self appointed importence and queenship, makes one very very nervous!

 

[GWS]

All I can ask is that she view a few dismembered fetuses before she supports this abomination.

 

[GWS]

Sorry, I couldn't resist
The REAL Kamala

 

[GWS]

 

[WowReactsOnly]

I'm down. At the same time show pics of car accident victims, abortion videos, pharmaceutical OD's, blunt weapon victims, edged weapon victims, etc etc etc.....Oh, but those dont fit the narrative.

As you older members may remember (or not) my family was victim to a horrific edged weapon murder. You dont see us running out trying to ban knives and hedge trimmers. Also victims of a mass shooting. You dont see us running out to ban firearms. Why do we let IDIOTS run this damn country.....

The dude abides

 

[E4mafia]

Wonder how many other corrupt people she will "service" for a bill to pass or other powers.

Kamala Harris' Dirty Little Sex Secret Comes Out After Jeff Sessions Shuts Her Big Mouth

 

[GWS]

On her back or on her knees.
Kamala Harris will render many a blow to advance her cause.

 

[Herb g]

show them baby autopsies until they vote they way you want? But arent politicians cannibals who eat babies to live longer? Might backfire.

...or you could show the ultrasound pic beside the one of baby parts post abortion - which kills thousands more than all gun deaths combined.