- Messages
- 1,310
- Reactions
- 911
This guy is not looking for a lawsuit, he's making a point. I commend him because he is correct about his rights. On the other hand, we know that walking down a main street of a metropolitan area with a gun will attract police. I in no way support any suppression of our rights, but I have to play Devil's Advocate here:
Imagine another person walking down the street with a gun. The police are called several times, yet they inform the caller that if all the individual is doing is walking down the street with a gun, he is breaking no law, therefore they cannot interfere with him. That person walks into Burger King and unloads his gun(s) into the customers and staff. Imagine those lawsuits.
It's a tough line the police have to walk and I do not envy their position. Sometimes it's tough to tell if you are harrassing a decent citizen that is exercising an inalienable right, or if you are preventing a mass murder. My whole point is that while I totally agree with everything the gentleman said in his defense, I can't blame the police for questioning his intentions. Kip.
Imagine another person walking down the street with a gun. The police are called several times, yet they inform the caller that if all the individual is doing is walking down the street with a gun, he is breaking no law, therefore they cannot interfere with him. That person walks into Burger King and unloads his gun(s) into the customers and staff. Imagine those lawsuits.
It's a tough line the police have to walk and I do not envy their position. Sometimes it's tough to tell if you are harrassing a decent citizen that is exercising an inalienable right, or if you are preventing a mass murder. My whole point is that while I totally agree with everything the gentleman said in his defense, I can't blame the police for questioning his intentions. Kip.