- Messages
- 735
- Reactions
- 108
Yeah not so serious about the last part. Very serious about the part before that though. Too bad nobody in government has any balls anymore.
Did you forget who our Secretary of State is????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah not so serious about the last part. Very serious about the part before that though. Too bad nobody in government has any balls anymore.
Any story that starts off by citing Hannity as a source is in 75% trouble already, IMO. Faux News is bad for you, you really should stop exposing yourselves to it.
a 2003 study has shown that the folks who soley rely on Faux are the worst misinformed when it comes to facts of any audience group.
<broken link removed>
Yeah not so serious about the last part. Very serious about the part before that though. Too bad nobody in government has any balls anymore.
So NPR is the best source of unbiased "news" reporting?? Ummmm... okay.
That "research" paper seemed awfully slanted towards "proving" a certain end result. And I'm not so sure I'd fall in line with a "research paper" that has it's source of funds listed as... "Funding for this research was provided by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Ford Foundation"
I'd prefer to see the raw data, the specific questions asked, and the sampling used on this specific "research paper" rather than just swallowing their synopsis as is. Summarizing a select few "polls" (which may have been "push" polls at that) can lead to whatever pre-conceived result the "researchers" want.