Financial Firepower Of Anti Gun Orgs vs Pro 2A Orgs.

[arakboss]

It astonishing to me how the anti-gun orgs can out spend us in a battle over anti-gun measures. On one side we have a massive amount of companies who make money off items being threatened. On the other side we have a group of orgs who seemingly will make no money from selling products if the measures pass. I could understand it more if the anti-gun orgs were going to make money off some technology or products that were going to replaced banned products. That doesn't appear to be the case. Are the gun companies and pro 2a donors asleep at the wheel? Why the disparity?

Read More

 

[Knobgoblin]

They are privately funded by NWO oligarchs. Such individuals are typically well invested in the " war machine" , along with oil and other things that anti gun voters consider evil. The source of this income is going to be well hidden from the public.
In other words, the money to ban private firearms ownership comes ( in part) from selling tanks and bombs .
You can see how bad this would look if the sheeple ever found out.

 

[Stomper]

It astonishing to me how the anti-gun orgs can out spend us in a battle over anti-gun measures. On one side we have a massive amount of companies who make money off items being threatened. On the other side we have a group of orgs who seemingly will make no money from selling products if the measures pass. I could understand it more if the anti-gun orgs were going to make money off some technology or products that were going to replaced banned products. That doesn't appear to be the case. Are the gun companies and pro 2a donors asleep at the wheel? Why the disparity?

Because in "their" minds… money is power and power is money, and having too much is never enough.

 

[Andy54Hawken]

Something to consider is just where your money goes when you donate it to a pro firearm organization.
Looking at you WLP.
( I am a life member of NRA....Just not a fan of WLP )

Also perhaps some firearm companies are more interested in making a buck , no matter where or how...than interested in the 2nd Amendment.
Andy

 

[Provincial]

We are living in the Gilded Age 2.0.

The first Gilded Age, in the mid- to late- 1800's, occurred when the USA industrialized, and those who started or grew the companies that fueled that industrialization grew immensely wealthy. They lived a high life, and controlled the nation through shrewd investments in mass communication and political sponsorship. Newspapers and corruption.

Gilded Age 2.0 is similar. The information/computerization/internet revolution has made a relatively small number of people immensely wealthy. Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post because it wields a great amount of influence on political decisions at the Federal level. Google (Alphabet, Inc.) controls internet search. Facebook controls much of what is seen on the Internet, and Twitter controls most of the rest.

The common people were able to rein in the first Gilded Age by electing politicians that promised to protect them from exploitation, and (lo and behold!) they did what they promised.

The scions of Gilded Age 2.0 are well aware of that, and are determined to not let it happen again. One threat that they see is an armed citizenry. An armed citizenry is impossible to control by brute force. It must be disarmed in order to establish an "authoritarian" (meaning tyrannical) society. Hence the huge amounts of cash being funneled into anti-gun organizations.

 

[Yarome]

Realizing too that we're not really talking about disarming the public with the intent to rule the population by armed force. It's more about control and taking away those things that make a person feel "empowered" that fuels a climate of resistance to the woke will.

Take away those symbols and means of independence, and the empowering elements of a persons life, and they are much more compliant and easily herded by social manipulation.

 

[Knobgoblin]

^^^^^
This man understands. Be careful my friend.