Gold Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 3,259
- Reactions
- 10,368
I've owned many variations of both guns.
The Redhawk is big. That's great if you want a big revolver. And in a soft puffer chambering, it's a pleasure to shoot.
For EDC, the GP is easier to carry. And in .357, it's still a relatively easy gun to shoot.
So, a big gun that's easy to shoot in .45, but also very big in your hand as well as hanging from your belt, or a mid-size in a chambering that's still formidable...
I see them as two different guns that only you can decide which is more important, carryability or shootability.
For me...Unless I need to hotrod the .45 Colt loading in the Redhawk, believe the GP to be more versatile. The Redhawk was designed for big, magnum cartridges.
The Redhawk is big. That's great if you want a big revolver. And in a soft puffer chambering, it's a pleasure to shoot.
For EDC, the GP is easier to carry. And in .357, it's still a relatively easy gun to shoot.
So, a big gun that's easy to shoot in .45, but also very big in your hand as well as hanging from your belt, or a mid-size in a chambering that's still formidable...
I see them as two different guns that only you can decide which is more important, carryability or shootability.
For me...Unless I need to hotrod the .45 Colt loading in the Redhawk, believe the GP to be more versatile. The Redhawk was designed for big, magnum cartridges.
Last Edited: