Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 37,313
- Reactions
- 128,757
So the sense of the folks posting in this thread is that the Sandy Hooks, San Bernardinos and Orlandos are fine so long as no one in the US is ever denied the right to buy an AK or an AR, even if they are suspected of being a terrorist?
Cool. I always wondered how deep the libertarian roots go.
I assume that when your wives or kids are shot by someone in a mass shooting somewhere you'll simply say, "gee, that's the price of freedom" and move on.
My wife and kids are able to shoot back... I'm not married to a sheep (I'm not from New Zeland, LOL), nor did I raise sheep.
The problem is these list will be used as a political weapon against those who would dare stand against the "ideology de jure". They're already starting to refer to "climate change deniers" as "terrorist" (as an example), and that list can be as broad (or narrow) as an arbitrary bureaucrat wants to make it.
Think that's a foolish notion? Compare how upside down logic and reason of the general population is compared to just 20 years ago.