Well, it is a toyota.Why the Ferk would you steal a Rav4?
I can’t fathom why you would want to go to jail foe stealing a POS. Especially as a carjacking.
At least go for a nice car you could joy ride a bit before going to jail.
My comment is somewhat satirical in nature. Acknowledging the positive outcome of the homeowner escaping physically unharmed from the incident, however, also acknowledging that the outcome could have also been, "better" had the aggressors been removed of their ability to harm others.Training is always good.
But considering the circumstances, it's definitely a high risk stressfire situation when you have to draw your firearm when the other guy already has his pointed at you. In self-defense, your goal is to stop an assailant from further lethal aggression ... period;
That happened here. No error, IMO. Especially if the perps were withdrawing away. If he had hit one or more, no foul either, but his goal was achieved.
Another reason why a limit of 5 in the magazine is ridiculous. You can train, but unless you include some form of adrenaline or heavy physical exercise before shooting, your first 5 shots may be off. Ooofff.The only error I see in this entire story (beyond the obvious criminal activity) is that the owner of the car missed with his shots.
Training folks. Get more.
Yah, but the coyote gangs are tough.We moved out of that area 27 seconds after I retired.
Seattle and the surrounding communities have turned into a 3rd world country.
Every time I see something like this I pat myself on the back and give my wife a hug.
Now, instead of being surrounded by potheads, druggies, thieves and other random
assorted criminals we have cows, horses, pasture land to the horizon and fresh air.
Not one cow has tried to steal anything from us and for some reason horses
haven't figured out how to fire a gun.
Understood the implication - I'd caution anyone about expressing such sentiments in public forums. Defending yourself or known innocents in immediate jeopardy is great.My comment ... "better" had the aggressors been removed of their ability to harm others.
Totally understand.Understood the implication - I'd caution anyone about expressing such sentiments in public forums. Defending yourself or known innocents in immediate jeopardy is great.
Defending the general public is a job for LEO.
In a fast moving defense situation, it's quite possible to shift from the defender to the aggressor with a simple action - with inherent civil or criminal liability associated.
Better to make certain there is no question.
Don't become the pursuer; I certainly suggest anyone not advocate that on forums.
Just my cautionary view.