Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 37,371
- Reactions
- 129,005
Yeah, he's high with a lust for power.I watched most of that interview with the head of the ATF and there's something wrong with that guy its like he was on something.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, he's high with a lust for power.I watched most of that interview with the head of the ATF and there's something wrong with that guy its like he was on something.
It REALLY started to go to sheite when the Federal Reserve (a private bank) was brought in, as well as making Senate seats open to the popular vote instead of state legislatures electing them, as originally intended.Good arguement to getting 100% rid of the Federal agencies, maybe even reduce entire Fed govt to just the SCOTUS/Fed Courts, and to heck with Congress and Executive branches? No more centralized Fed govt. Just let States do whatever they want to do. Probably result in the Balkanization of the States into regional Districts forever politically at odds with each other
Maybe I missed the part where he agrees with not having a database, citing historical events."If you're really concerned about violent crime in the United States, this agency is way, way, way too small." - Dettelbach
ATF director Steven Dettelbach says "we have to work within that system" since there is no federal gun registry
The ATF is prohibited by federal law from creating a centralized database of registered gun owners.www.cbsnews.com
I saved my self the agony of lost brain cells, didn't read. Don't need to because I got you guys!I watched most of that interview with the head of the ATF and there's something wrong with that guy its like he was on something.
I think that goes for most elected and or appointed officials, from the POTUS, right on down to mayors and council members. have you seen any interviews with local officials? for the most part a bunch of lunatics.I watched most of that interview with the head of the ATF and there's something wrong with that guy its like he was on something.
They're all drunk on power...something about the liberty tree being watered or something comes to mind.there's something wrong with that guy its like he was on something.
Offering positions of power tends to attract the scum of the earth. If they really just wanted to help make the world a better place like they all claim, they'd be doing it without getting their pockets lined and special protections.They're all drunk on power...something about the liberty tree being watered or something comes to mind.
Appealing to the fears of sheeple who don't understand they're the first and only reliable line of defense when it comes to their lives and those they love.Seems these bureaucrats keep saying the quiet part out loud....Who elected you bruh?
Defund the ATF.Dissolve the ATF
Refund with compounded accumulative interest the tax stamps paid since 1934 to everyone who paid into them, including the estates of those who died since then... out of the personal incomes of everyone who has worked the tops of the ATF and the IRSOffering positions of power tends to attract the scum of the earth. If they really just wanted to help make the world a better place like they all claim, they'd be doing it without getting their pockets lined and special protections.
Appealing to the fears of sheeple who don't understand they're the first and only reliable line of defense when it comes to their lives and those they love.
Indeed but the notion is to hold the initial purchasers liable for crimes commited with guns that left their hands. Same thing that they've been trying against manufacturers/retailersJust skimming the article but this part makes NO sense at all:
Instead, the ATF works to find the initial purchaser of the firearm through its system of records, before being able to confirm whether they or someone else committed the crime.
'They or someone else committed the crime' ? While I understand the need to eventually find the original purchaser (if it is NOT the one who committed the crime) Unless I am missing something it seems to me the one CAUGHT is the one who committed the crime.
Finding the initial purchaser does not verify who committed the crime.
Hahahaha, agreed!Wonder if he wants some curds to go along with his whey...
The ATF just need to go away.
Andy
Did you learn that one in teacher college?Wonder if he wants some curds to go along with his whey...
The ATF just need to go away.
Andy
The Founders were very keenly aware of the Evil Nature of Man and they did one incredible job of creating a system of checks and balances and a Bill of Rights in an attempt to minimize that risk.They're all drunk on power...something about the liberty tree being watered or something comes to mind.
Nope....Some little tart named Miss Moffett was very , very naughty.and learned me a thing or two...Did you learn that one in teacher college?
What are you saying, you got a little "Enhanced Education" from said strumpet???Nope....Some little tart named Miss Moffett was very , very naughty.and learned me a thing or two...
Andy
Well now....What are you saying, you got a little "Enhanced Education" from said strumpet???