during an event with a black guy? That they killed?No, using a racial slur during just the event is not enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
during an event with a black guy? That they killed?No, using a racial slur during just the event is not enough.
Some how I doubt that. What makes you think that TM would not have shot a white person who was attempting to disarm him?If Ahmaud Arbery had been white he never would have been shot.
Not necessarily by itself.during an event with a black guy? That they killed?
What? Unrealsistic? Are you saying that AA had not grabbed TM's gun when he was shot? If TM had not gotten within gun reaching distance to Arbery? Given that AA charged TM, the only way to have prevented AA from getting within reaching distance would to have shot him sooner. Playing out some bizzare fantacy precipitated by the movies. The speculation in this thread is amazing.I agree and have said so before but I always find it interesting (not only in this situation but others I have read) where so many try to justify the shooting of an unarmed person as 'self defense' by saying 'he was trying to arm himself' (or something equally unrealistic or 'tacticoolish' sounding)
Arbery was simply trying to save himself by keeping the barrel away from his body. If Travis McMichael had NOT gotten within gun reaching distance to Arbery (which is always a wrong thing to do) Arbery would have never grabbed it.
Travis McMichael is obviously not too bright and was most likely playing out some bizzare fantasy precipitated by movies or other influences.
Sad and disgusting.Nevermind the fact that they chased him with guns for several blocks with two different vehicles till they "cornered him like a rat" ...
this whole thread is sad to read.
to put it nicely...Sad and disgusting.
They wouldnt have chased him down in the first place. You guys dont know the rural south well do you?Some how I doubt that. What makes you think that TM would not have shot a white person who was attempting to disarm him?
And if it doesn't come out in the second (and unnecessary and Constitutionally questionable) trial, you'll still believe it!They wouldnt have chased him down in the first place. You guys dont know the rural south well do you?
Itll come out in the second trial...and you still wont believe it.
Nope I'm a due process guy. I accept court judgments and elections as matter of fact.And if it doesn't come out in the second (and unnecessary and Constitutionally questionable) trial, you'll still believe it!
Let's be honest, playing armchair judge, jury, and executioner is a baseless exercise for either side of the debate.
Arbery changed direction and ran at travis. You should really look into the case as a whole and what precipitated it. Arbery wasn't a random guy that was targeted.I agree and have said so before but I always find it interesting (not only in this situation but others I have read) where so many try to justify the shooting of an unarmed person as 'self defense' by saying 'he was trying to arm himself' (or something equally unrealistic or 'tacticoolish' sounding)
Arbery was simply trying to save himself by keeping the barrel away from his body. If Travis McMichael had NOT gotten within gun reaching distance to Arbery (which is always a wrong thing to do) Arbery would have never grabbed it.
Travis McMichael is obviously not too bright and was most likely playing out some bizzare fantasy precipitated by movies or other influences.
Actually, if you look at what came out in the trial that is exactly what he wasArbery changed direction and ran at travis. You should really look into the case as a whole and what precipitated it. Arbery wasn't a random guy that was targeted.
The trial was theater. Look at Rittenhouse and what the state tried to do.Actually, if you look at what came out in the trial that is exactly what he was
Fact but possible not truth.Nope I'm a due process guy. I accept court judgments and elections as matter of fact.
We have processes in place. All we can do is trust due process.Fact but possible not truth.
The process has been politicized the point it's almost completely brokenWe have processes in place. All we can do is trust due process.
The first and largest mistake was that ol pops and his son are NOT cops and shouldn't have played cops. They made the mistake of trying to chase the guy down and hold him at gun point and that isn't a great start to claiming self defense. If I remember right ol pops had been a cop but wasn't anymore he should have known better. I don't give a rip even if the guy was prowling the construction site it still doesn't justify what they did. Even if he hadnt grabbed the gun and been shot the three numbnuts would still be up on charges for illegal detainment, kidnapping, assault, criminal mischief, brandishing, etc. ect. Play stupid games win stupid prizes......
I have two q's for you.Arbery changed direction and ran at travis. You should really look into the case as a whole and what precipitated it. Arbery wasn't a random guy that was targeted.
You may be willing to trust the process but having seen the blatant abuse by all levels of government, I am not willing to trust them at all. I also do not subscribe to the view that there is noting else we can do. If the founding fathers thought that way we would still be part of England or maybe Canada, with no 2A rights whatsoever.We have processes in place. All we can do is trust due process.