- Messages
- 591
- Reactions
- 415
See Carlos Miller's blog about photography and police harassment, and read Radley Balko's blog. It needs to be put out there clearly that:
1. Police have zero expectation of prrivacy when acting in an official capacity
2. Amateur photographers and videographers have the same rights as official 'press' to film in public.
3. A police officer, acting under colour of authority to suppress or prevent film or video evidence, is committing a federal felony.
I agree that most cops are simpy ordinary people doing a difficult job. I understand that they are reasonably afraid of armchair criticism, but the way to avoid that is not to suppress evidence, but to make it available and then argue your case. In any event, they have no RIGHT to confiscate film or video, and no RIGHT to harass or intimdate the people filming.
1. Police have zero expectation of prrivacy when acting in an official capacity
2. Amateur photographers and videographers have the same rights as official 'press' to film in public.
3. A police officer, acting under colour of authority to suppress or prevent film or video evidence, is committing a federal felony.
I agree that most cops are simpy ordinary people doing a difficult job. I understand that they are reasonably afraid of armchair criticism, but the way to avoid that is not to suppress evidence, but to make it available and then argue your case. In any event, they have no RIGHT to confiscate film or video, and no RIGHT to harass or intimdate the people filming.