But.... they "have" to do all that. That's the only way to keep the crime rate statistics under control.
But.... they "have" to do all that. That's the only way to keep the crime rate statistics under control.
Many states are following the same model. They have to justify the losses of freedom by showing results. If the results don't support the narrative... easy peasy.... decriminalize crime, stop arresting and most importantly.... stop prosecuting cases.
If you ignore it, you don't have to report it.
When criminals make up a significant percentage of your voter base, you're not going to retain their votes if you make it more difficult for them to continue their chosen career paths, right(?) That's just common sense!!
unfoundation.org
You talk as if Democrats care about our ConstitutionLooking at the laws and policies passed by our more...liberal governments over the last 10 years with prison & prison sentencing reform, weakened crime laws, reduced enforcement, reduced sentences, and punishment for most crimes, this drives more crime. The canned solution is gun control, bans, and regulations ignored by the criminal element, mostly affecting the population that isn't responsible for most of the crime.
I see this as social engineering; they created a crime problem, with a canned solution of gun control, gun bans, and, ultimately, confiscation, but why?
Put your tin foil hat on.
Many Cities and states are acting on their own climate agendas Oregon, California, NY, and others ..banning natural gas, and gas-powered cars, but most importantly they aren't putting these to a vote, it's being done without citizen consent, it's not done on a federal level. these people think their opinion and agenda is more important than your input or approval.
States are entering into a Climate Alliance together under the UN see the link ...
7 Ways U.S. States are Leading Climate Action | unfoundation.org
People in the United States may seem divided, but when it comes to protecting the planet, 24 governors have joined forces to support the Paris Agreement on climate change.
This violates Section. 10 of the constitution
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;
AND, No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
good point
Just call him Dick. It's more fitting.
people also didnt' believe M114 would ever be a thing when it was still in its planning stage and not even on a ballot....... don't underestimate your enemy and Dictators like Newsom when they have moronic mindless zombies following them
How many States are solidly Democratic?
)I'll admit im not familiar with how the process works but I just know that if or when the table is turned in their favor they will go for the throat so to speak.How many States are solidly Democratic?
How many States are solidly Republican?
How many are mixed (either R/D or D/I or R/I)?
There are 22 States with Republican trifectas (whereas the party have Governorship, State senate and State House), 17 States with Democratic trifectas (Oregon is one such State); and lastly, 11 States where neither Party holds a trifecta.
And then we have a Federal Senate that's basically split down the middle with almost 50/50 Party control (only the Independent Senators prevent that but they both caucus with Dems anyhow
All the more reason to get involved with politics and elections, the only hope is to reduce the number of democrats elected at all levels. Only we can help turn the tide and help get more and more republicans elected.
Forgive my negative outlook on this. But society in general has a slight natural liberal bias.
might be the thing that starts a civil war..... at this point, America can choose a civil war or continue to let them incrementally chip away a the constitution and our rights
very hard to say. Gun owners have been not voting or something for years on the issue or we wouldnt be here if it was so important theyd go to war over the right. We've gone way past the infringement part, and the laws keep coming (eg 114).
True, but teach others. I'm personally responsible for bringing several people into the gun ownership realm. I will continue to educate those that show an interest, even if only a passing interest. It's my small way of ensuring I leave behind more than one supporter to replace me when I'm gone.
agree with this and I do but theres more to this than just ownership, gun rights needs 2A supporters enough to get Democrat politicians to listen in blue states.
This is true and I do agree. Getting gun owners to vote, it's like trying to pull hens teethā¦
My guess is there are slightly more liberal gun owners than conservative gun owners. And the liberals are less concerned with being able to carry ("bear") arms as long as they have access to arms they tend to be ok with restrictive gun control laws (registration, gun free zones etc.). My guess is those that feel this way are out of touch with reality on if the day comes they ever need to carry a gun for protection on just how their laws infringe on that. Many of the ones Ive talked with disagree there is a movement to prohibit guns like AR15s etc as well, that part baffles me but I suspect media bias has a lot to do with that.
