- Messages
- 996
- Reactions
- 1,778
do they not have the right to refuse service to anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not based on on things like race, sex and age. This is really the same situation as the cake/bakery case. Except in that case the shop owners were claiming it violated their religious freedoms. In this case, Dick's and Walmart don't really have anything like that to stand on. I'm very curious what their actual defense is going to be.do they not have the right to refuse service to anyone?
Is the ALCU providing legal representation?
True that. They stopped years ago and then started up again.Freddies is run by Krogers now. Lucky you can get guns at all there. They wouldnt think twice about pulling the whole product line if push comes to shove.
No. That's not how it works. That's not how it worked in the cake case.all any store has to do, is say the customer was being rude . What is being rude?
No. That's not how it works. That's not how it worked in the cake case.
Sorry, I posted the wrong quote. I was trying to respond to the individual who made the comment about "all it takes is being rude". I just edited my post to try to correct the quote.Freddies is Run by Kroger. My wife has worked there for a long time since before the Kroger acquisition. Kroger would pull the plug on guns in a New York second. So yes, that is how it works.
I'm wishing Mr Watson luck in this, but don't see a decision in his favor unless it gets to the Supreme Court. Oregon courts are a biased joke, and the 9th would never give him a win.
I suspect a patented "OREGON LEGISLATIVE EMERGENCY!!!" in response now that there is a gun grabbing supermajority in both Oregon houses thanks to a few key Republican traiturds joining up.
I was thinking the same thing. All it takes is a new state law that changes the purchase age and this court case is over - unless they want to sue the state for age discrimination, and I suspect that is dead before it even starts.
I don't think they will restrict the counter legislation and just make a change to legal age. I expect them to use it as an opportunity to bundle a bunch of things in since the masses have been conditioned to support raising the legal age. I'm thinking AWB, magazines, pistol grips and anything scary looking. The only question is how far they will go now that they have carte blanche given to them by uninformed voters.
I sure wish someone would sue the State, and Kate Brown, over these atrocious violations of our rights to self defense.I was thinking the same thing. All it takes is a new state law that changes the purchase age and this court case is over - unless they want to sue the state for age discrimination, and I suspect that is dead before it even starts.
I sure wish someone would sue the State, and Kate Brown, over these atrocious violations of our rights to self defense.
Brown said just yesterday, when signing that new law, that this was just another step in the right direction on gun laws.
I'm wishing Mr Watson luck in this, but don't see a decision in his favor unless it gets to the Supreme Court. Oregon courts are a biased joke, and the 9th would never give him a
I suspect a patented "OREGON LEGISLATIVE EMERGENCY!!!" in response now that there is a gun grabbing supermajority in both Oregon houses thanks to a few key Republican traiturds joining up.