Staff Member
Diamond Supporter
Platinum Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,559
- Reactions
- 18,017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They should use the text in the 2A to strike down the gun laws, it seems very clear....
Yeah. No.
All rights have constraints. You can argue against them but it's just hogswallop to believe you're going to make headway. The founders set the constitution up to go through courts like they are now.
In all future history and all alternate universes, "shall not be abridged" does not mean there won't be limits.
We CAN make the case that PROTECTED weapons are: 1) in common use. 2) not unduly dangerous (like a flamethrower or machinegun) 3) and an individual weapon like a rifle and not a crew served anti tank gun.
That draws a pretty clear line between semi-automatic weapons being protected, and the fun stuff which is not. The weapons that are not protected are still legal on a state by state basis, but not protected.
This line is what we should all be looking to keep and what this case may very well do.
Me and mrs America keep your semi-autos is a reasonable and possible place to fight.