Why the Left coast is stubbornly insane?

[bugeye]

The dems held congress (both the house and the senate) for the last 2 years of the bush administration, that added to the two years this fool has been in office means that the libtarded democrats have had 4 years to do something positive. Well my libtarded friend, they haven't, nor do they have any intent on doing anything but tax and spend. Socialism is obama's goal, share the wealth, turn this country into a 3rd class nation by bowing to every tin hat dictator. Impeach him, even that *** clown bite-me could do better!

Yeah without them doing nothing we would all be in bread lines. You folks fail to understand, probably on purpose, the magnitude of the pit our economy could have fallen in. Of course, you are irresponsible and never had to make such a decision so the absolute truth of your position only needs be tested in that microscopic domain between your two ears where you are a perfect soothsayer.

And as to the party that has done nothing, they are the goofs you just proudly put back into power.

3rd world nations seem to have one thing in common, they have only rich and poor, and no middle. No American Political Party has ever tried harder to eliminate the middle class than your beloved GOP. The upper 20% of the money in the US currently owns 92% of the wealth, man it is obvious that these ubbers are being horribly abused by our 'socialist' government!

 

[gehrheart]

Yeah and Bush settled for just holding hands and stopping any further investigations of the flow of Saudi money to terrorist groups 6 months before 9-11!

And find a post any where where I have stated Bush was great.

A president of the USA should never bow before another.

 

[riverrat373]

Obama is spending 200 million a day on his trip to India. Liberalism is a mental dissorder. 34 warships and 40 aircraft for the trip to Mumbia on your dime. Democrat corruption.

jj

This is a typical statement from you Jim. That figure came from a newspaper in India and certain right wing pundits just repeated it WITHOUT even bothering to verify it! $200 million a day is more than we spend daily on the war in Afghanistan! The figure is actually about 1.5 million a day which is in line with what previous presidents have spent.

 

[8ball]

Something about being President makes you want to bow to and hold hands with Saudis I guess.

 

[gehrheart]

Yep have problems with that as well.

 

[Visceral]

And find a post any where where I have stated Bush was great.

A president of the USA should never bow before another.

And yet, for some strange reason, we never see posts in here full of hate and scorn for the Republicans that do exactly the same thing.

THe "internets" were here in 2004 when Bush was spending his way into the pocket of every billionaire and consolidating the taxes of every middle class person into the companies that are currently holding on to their cash at record rates.

I assure you, the 2A/Firearm boards were not alight with anger at the Republican's governing. There's very little that bothers me more than the hypocrite nature of most right wing angst about the deficit.

The right wing didn't complain when Cheney said "Deficits don't matter."

 

[bugeye]

And find a post any where where I have stated Bush was great.

A president of the USA should never bow before another.

Yeah that bowing was bad, no problem with denying our intelligence agencies any valuable information on the flow of Saudi money to terrorists 6 months before 9-11 now is there, sheesh!

 

[Just Jim]

Something about being President makes you want to bow to and hold hands with Saudis I guess.

Muslims eat and do everything like shake hands with their right hand. They clean themselves with their left. To give them your left hand is an insult in their world. It looked funny to see two muslim men walking down the street holding right hands when I was in Iraq.

jj

 

[Just Jim]

This is a typical statement from you Jim. That figure came from a newspaper in India and certain right wing pundits just repeated it WITHOUT even bothering to verify it! $200 million a day is more than we spend daily on the war in Afghanistan! The figure is actually about 1.5 million a day which is in line with what previous presidents have spent.

I am willing to bet this whole thing got started by a democrat who posted the original 200 million a day figures. However if those figures are a fantasy they are no more a fantasy than yours, where did you get them??

jj

 

[gehrheart]

And yet, for some strange reason, we never see posts in here full of hate and scorn for the Republicans that do exactly the same thing.

THe "internets" were here in 2004 when Bush was spending his way into the pocket of every billionaire and consolidating the taxes of every middle class person into the companies that are currently holding on to their cash at record rates.

I assure you, the 2A/Firearm boards were not alight with anger at the Republican's governing. There's very little that bothers me more than the hypocrite nature of most right wing angst about the deficit.

The right wing didn't complain when Cheney said "Deficits don't matter."

Wasn't here for the bush years (feel free to check my join date).
So If I bash Obama, then I must be a right wing republican?
Kind of short sighted isn't?

Personally I find that insulting. Not that I imagine that you would care. I have plenty of beefs with the Bush's, But that is not what the subject was about. So now I am a Hypocrite because I disagree with you?


Before you call me out, better know a little more about me. I'm not on the right, I hate the left. Die hard Libertarian, I fully believe in capitalism. Preferably with out government interference. I believe in the Gold standard.
I also believe Zomaba is a socialist bent on bring down our constitution.


Now that you have a better idea of me, you can call me out with out having to pretend you know about me.


And no the board were not a light with fire when the Red held control, Few believe the republicans are going to take our guns away. Most guns owners believe the Democrats WILL! After all this is a firearms board, that should be the central discussion here.

I understand not all democrats want to take our guns, however I have never meet one that does not understand "shall not be infringed". All of them want,
"sensible Legislation"

Compromise A bill of right!!!!!!
No!
I do not care party line. There Should be no Compromise to a bill of right.

 

[Just Jim]

You are right that this is a gun board. However to understand those leftist that are against our rights we can't have tunnel vision and only focus on the Second Amendment. The entire leftist ideology should be looked at so people can understand why they are anti gun. If you want to know why the left is stuck on stupid you need the big picture.

Conversations exspose who they are and what they believe. The real pleasure comes from them trying to defend those ideals verbally.

jj

 

[gehrheart]

You are right that this is a gun board. However to understand those leftist that are against our rights we can't have tunnel vision and only focus on the Second Amendment. The entire leftist ideology should be looked at so people can understand why they are anti gun. If you want to know why the left is stuck on stupid you need the big picture.

Conversations exspose who they are and what they believe. The real pleasure comes from them trying to defend those ideals verbally.

jj

Oh I get that, I am however trying to keep this within the rules of the board and keeping the topic gun related.

 

[gehrheart]

Yeah that bowing was bad, no problem with denying our intelligence agencies any valuable information on the flow of Saudi money to terrorists 6 months before 9-11 now is there, sheesh!

Again I will ask, where Have I stated such? Dig really deep.

Call me out if you'd like but please have your facts or at least know a little about me.

Why are leftist so quick to judge and classify based on a couple quick posts on a Internet board, that I seem to have beef with Zombama, then I must automatically be a bush idolizer. Are you really that short sighted? Do you really believe there is only two sides? Two parties? Two ideologies?
Or is it your so quick to defend Zombama that you forget to think?

 

[Jamie6.5]

No American Political Party has ever tried harder to eliminate the middle class than your beloved GOP.

Nice try buggy. There is no middle class in the dem's preferred system. It's the dems that have continually tried to turn us into the proletariat.

The middle class is the engine that drives profits. And if you notice, only the leftist dems demonize profits. Like you just did.
The right likes free markets, dislikes unions, and lionizes profit(s). In a free market system they are essential.

And that sums up why the dems continue to work towards doing away with our country as we know it.

 

[Just Jim]

The progressive strategy of useing Cloward and Piven tactics to attack people personally when they the progressives can't win an argument works well against people who don't know the tactic. Hold the progressive to subject matter and he falls apart. He attacks people personally and demeans them to put them on the defensive. Play by their rules and they run the game.

Better to press the subject matter and don't let them wander.

jj

 

[Stomper]

I was definately NOT in love with either Bush-I (served under him, and Regan), nor Bush-II... Newt was a shrill shrew, Ahr-nold is a RINO (I USED to love his movies)... blah blah blah.

FYI- Months before the election, I met a local contendor for the "Green Party" trying to gather enough signatures to get on the ballot outside the local Safeway. He was a pleasant enough fella, I asked him about his "idealogy", turned out to be a HARD LEFTY (internationalist, green-Green-GREEN, etc.).

I told him, I couldn't DISAGREE MORE with most his "beliefs" and wouldn't/couldn't EVER vote for someone like him (and why), but I also told him I respected his efforts to participate in the process and that he should have a shot at office like anyone else making the effort. Because he looked me in the eye and answered my (quite) direct questions, I did right by him and SIGNED his petition to make the ballot.

I don't recall seeing him on the ballot (didn't look too hard either), and NOBODY from the "Green Party" won a single seat that I know of, but my point is I didn't help "torpedo" the guy's efforts just because we were in opposition to "the way things ought to be". How many of you "lefty's" would have signed the ballot petition of someone trying to run for office that you disagreed with?


I have OFFICIALLY changed my voter registration to "no party affiliation", since ALL of them suck wind ATM.