JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
There is an awful lot of information missing from that article. At first blush it certainly looks like the owner didn't have a right to be using his firearm but there are a lot of "blanks" in the story.
Not in his gun they weren't.
 
There is an awful lot of information missing from that article. At first blush it certainly looks like the owner didn't have a right to be using his firearm but there are a lot of "blanks" in the story.
I would think there would be more to the story if they only took the firearm into custody...
 
Hey, I am a Jeep lover!!
1741298142494.png
 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top