Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,001
- Reactions
- 21,210
Good post! In a similar vein I often hear people say, "but they wouldn't bother to prosecute you for that". Well that may be true in the first year or years of a new ban. But what about in the future? And what if the cop is an a-hole? Don't assume cops will be nice and not prosecute. Assume that if they have the authority they will, and take steps accordingly.Let's not assume the government rationally prioritizes the biggest fish for the earliest frying.
FBI Arrest of Florida Man for Short-Barreled Rifle Showcases Absurdity of NFA
A police officer or sheriff’s deputy would have likely warned Mejia not to attach the stock, instead the FBI treated him like St. Cloud, Florida’s newest Al Qaeda sleeper cell.www.ammoland.com
Another example is right now the OR gov and Portland mayor have proposed adding 100 state troopers to help with Portland crime. We already know the former head of the state patrol resigned due to Portland not prosecuting the crims. And then Kate brown appointed her own woman to be the head of the state patrol. So now we have an expanding state police force answerable to the far left governor. If this governor decides to do a jay inslee/Ferguson we could have the majority of Oregon police focused on petty administrative gun laws (such as m114 - assuming the or Supreme Court restarts it) as a top priority. So they can go from "nice guys" to a mandated "enforcing minor technical administrative gun laws is our top Priority" almost overnight.