Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless your headed into Boise in the morning rushOr you could just ride in Idaho, we don't need lane splitting laws (since for the most part you will never see enough cars at one time there is anything to split)
If passed
Education of drivers is the KEY!
I figure they do educate drivers, they educated me in 1972 and I still follow the general rules of the road. What I see now is drivers that completely ignore those general rules. I don't know how you get them to drive by those general rules. Heck, it would seem you can't even get people to look both ways before crossing a street anymore with all the pedestrians that get hit by cars!
I ment of the new change.... as putting it on the ODOT reader board's on I5.
When riding around Caldwell and Boise on I 84 the board would flash BE AWARE OF MOTORCYCLES!
Unless your headed into Boise in the morning rush
I didn't lose anything there so there is no reason for me to go there.Your right I am smart enough to stay away from there.
Apparently you haven't commuted in puget sound very much.
Looking at the population in Boise yesterday and it would need to multiply 100 X to get even close to the traffic jam known as puget sound
LOL....In Portland motorists are constantly cautioned to watch out for bicyclists and pedestrians, yet there are NO cautions to bicyclists and pedestrians to watch out for cars! They set up stings with a person standing on a corner and ticket cars that don't STOP and allow the ped to cross. LOL As a driver of a 4000 pound vehicle I have all kinds of things to watch for, and at times I'm not looking at the person standing on the corner because there's a door being opened into traffic, a car backing out into traffic, etc. LOL
Off topic some I know, point is I don't think those reader boards would help. Also, in traffic, that's likely to be running slow, I don't pay near as much attention to behind me, (where cycles would be coming from) as I do in front of me.
This thread is disturbing. All we're missing, to make this a wonderful "assault weapons" analogy, is for someone to add, "No one needs a bike that powerful".
It's got all the other elements: judging the many by the actions of the few; using examples of behavior that's already illegal and has nothing to do with what's being proposed; wishing injury on people doing stuff you don't like; having no understanding of the thing being regulated, but being eager to regulate it anyway ...
Just sayin'.
When your on a 500-1000lb bike with 3500-6000lb vehicles, you tend to ride as if you life depends on it.
Thing is, if you as a driver of a 4-wheeler follow proper driving rules lane splitting would be safe.
It hurts even more at 85 MPHAny realistic biker knows that it's not if you will have an accident it's that you WILL have an accident.
Some lucky people may avoid that fact but most will have a minor accident at the least.
I'm one of the unlucky ones - getting thrown off a bike with protective gear on at 35 hurts like hell and is one of the more painful things that has happened to me.
I've yet to see a crotch rocket rider drive with care and consideration.