- Messages
- 649
- Reactions
- 11
Part of organizing is to work with existing organizations that have been there, done that, have the connections, have the track record, have proven effective. Many would agree that OFF meets those criteria and more. For those that disagree, start another thread and give some hard data to prove your assertions, otherwise your words are ramblings that should be rejected. If data is part of a discussion, then I think it is wise for anyone to at least honestly listen to the facts, investigate them, and then make an WELL informed decision.
Well, I take my facts from a discussion I had with Kevin...His characterization of police officers in the Elian Gonzalez case as "goons" and a subsequent conversation, lead me to never consent to working with his group. For someone that claims "uncompromising" virtues, his only compromise comes from him not filing reports on where 'contributions' are being spent
click here
SO, is this his way of sticking it to the man? Or does he have something he doesn't want to tell people? "missing the following required information: the addresses for two contributors and the name of the payee for one personal expenditure (3 items)."
Did you notice how even though the "man" is out to get him, they did not impose the ten dollar fine? Or was it because of his political might that they bowed to him?
All I'm saying is that in many circles, he is considered a constitutionalist politician, not a freedom fighter. If we want to be considered main stream and bring people to the cause, we should align ourselves with someone more presentable.
Last Edited: