- Messages
- 1,010
- Reactions
- 1,639
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Tapco AK mags are actually underrated. I've thrown them fully loaded, dropped on the feed lips, run over them. Not a problem. They're stout as hell. The newer smooth-side ones even look like a modern Russian/Polish 7.62x39 mag.
The Tapco Galil mag passed all the same tests, but the rear latch tab is too small. It snaps off easily under stress. If Tapco just took their 5.45x39 mag, used their smooth-side mold to make it look like an ordinary AK mag, and adjusted the curvature for 5.56, I would buy a ton of them.
I would buy one of those if they can measure up to snuff on the lugs.
^^^They make ok AKs, not as good as Russian or Bulgarian or Chinese or Hungarian or ... come to think of it I've seen some pretty rough Tantals. Regardless, polymer AK mags without steel locking lugs have proven to fail time and time again. Maybe they have it figured out, I don't know. In the meantime I'll stick with Circle 10s or Steel East ComBloc or Chicom AK mags, I know they
work.
I think that's just the junk they try selling commercially.Polish military is now using non-reinforced composite mags.
I think that's just the junk they try selling commercially.
There is no way a military would down grade... well then again..
I was harsh on tapco, I practice with them.. but thats about it. They're made to be cheap affordable training magazines and that's about it. They'll stand up to some abuse, but in the end the steels, polish and circle 10s and US palms win in the end.
I'd played with the foreign plastic mags (Non Reinforced).
Junk, they work, and I'm sure to some extent they last (Not for me though) but save your cash and just purchase some tapcos unless you're getting a screaming deal or unless you're a collector.