National reciprocity passes 1st hurdle

[Dave Workman]

CCW Reciprocity Passes First Hurdle 19-11 in Judiciary


The Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act passed its first hurdle Wednesday by passing out of the House Judiciary Committee on a 19-11 vote, and it will now head to full consideration on the House floor, possibly before the end of the year.


CCW Reciprocity Passes First Hurdle 19-11 in Judiciary - Liberty Park Press

Read More

 

[Stomper]

Awesome!

 

[Mark W.]

awesome times 2

 

[DaveLikesGuns]

Cool! I read in NRA's American Hunter magazine that DC has become a shall Issue state/domain recently.

Baby steps.

 

[No_Regerts]

You know that won't happen. My says that some horrible event will occur on the eve of any progress on this.

 

[2A2Dend]

Nice to read news in a positive direction.
I stand behind this topic.

Thanks for sharing the news Dave!

 

[WWShooter]

Unless and until the SCOTUS is prepared to strike down every gun law in every state (and I don't see that happening anytime soon), I don't see how Congress can require a sovereign state to accept another state's CCP.

Washington, for example, doesn't require any training; Oregon does. Without debating the wisdom of requiring training or not, why should Oregon be forced to accept CCPs held by untrained Washington residents?

 

[Goosebrown]

Excellent. Wanted it earlier but it's good it has started to move

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

 

[Oathkeeper1775]

My .02,

People who have a CHL in their home state and perhaps from conservative states like Utah; should think twice before letting their "other state CHL" expire.

Many policies in the USA run on election cycles; in the case of a Utah CHL, renewal is only $10.00.... so I've heard...

 

[Caveman Jim]

I do not believe that the anti-freedom progressive liberal Bloombots will let this happen. They will not give us law abiding gun owners anything that they have taken away in the past, they want MORE control and power over their lowly subjects.

 

[B5Ben]

Washington, for example, doesn't require any training; Oregon does. Without debating the wisdom of requiring training or not, why should Oregon be forced to accept CCPs held by untrained Washington residents?

I don't recall any "training" to get my OR CWP, unless the 45 min online class counts. I think there should be a certain level of training that goes along with it but I also think that is definitely going to be one of the biggest hurdles that will have to be overcome if anything passes.

 

[Certaindeaf]

Nice. Imna go to California, f'rs!

 

[titsonritz]

Libtard heads are imploding nation wide. Love it.

 

[41mag]

Without debating the wisdom of requiring training or not, why should Oregon be forced to accept CCPs held by untrained Washington residents?

see your point; here's another to consider:
if We the People have the RIGHT to bear arms, how does putting it in our pocket instead of on our belt, negate that very RIGHT?

If We the People have the RIGHT to 'free speech' how does sticking our hands in our pockets reduce such RIGHT?

And IF each State has agreed to accept 'The Constitution' of the us.fed.gov, then just how does local modifications of RIGHTS pass the legal test? By being 'individual State Citizen' my RIGHTS are somehow lesser than as 'US Citizen'??? Please explain.

 

[hatchj]

Chances are your carry weapon wont be legal sown there, lol.

Only thing that MIGHT get me down there is Disneyland when my daughter is old enough.

 

[titsonritz]

Unless and until the SCOTUS is prepared to strike down every gun law in every state (and I don't see that happening anytime soon), I don't see how Congress can require a sovereign state to accept another state's CCP.

Washington, for example, doesn't require any training; Oregon does. Without debating the wisdom of requiring training or not, why should Oregon be forced to accept CCPs held by untrained Washington residents?

"Training" that's funny.

 

[Raidingtime]

Right when I applied for my Utah permit.

 

[PiratePast40]

I'd rather see the SHARE act moving forward. I'm afraid that reciprocity will involve some sort of standards that equate to documentation of qualification. I don't want to be wrapped up in some stupid live fire test like in Texas, or stipulation that you can't carry in a place that serves alcohol. These things always seem to default to the most restrictive in an attempt to tiptoe around states rights. If that's the direction it takes, you're only inviting the man deeper into your life.

EDIT: My bad, I didn't read the article before commenting. Approaching it like a civil rights issue shows promise.

 

[Hawaiian]

Only thing that MIGHT get me down there is Disneyland when my daughter is old enough.​

There is always Disney World in Florida!​