Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 886
- Reactions
- 1,883
So just to be clear......the date of March whatever (15?) is still the Permit date, correct? Who are we waiting on, if anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frustrating isn't it? Wheels turn slowly waiting for the Oregon Supremes to make a decision. Even if they declare it constitutional, there needs to be a permit system in place in order for anyone to comply. They can certainly make it a requirement and then we can start the process of finding someone harmed by the law, find a legal group willing to take up the case, and then start raising money again.So just to be clear......the date of March whatever (15?) is still the Permit date, correct? Who are we waiting on, if anyone?
That part pisses me off tbh. The only effective weapon we have right now is the courts and those group are the ones doing the fighting. Yet these people complain about them? WTF? I mean they must be simply retarded. There is no other explanation for their idiocy.…
Then we need to wade through all the comments from people saying that pro-gun groups are worthless and then say they won't donate or lift a finger to protect their rights.![]()
Oregon Supreme Court. It is my understanding that March is also the deadline for them to make their ruling on the case. Their ruling could come down any day/any minute, but there is a deadline for when they need to complete it. So that is what we are waiting on. With the stay for M114 in place, nothing goes into effect until that stay is lifted- which could be done by the Oregon Supreme Court. So we wait for them. Buy those standard capacity mags now boys before any decision becomes eminent or other vendors start choosing not to ship to Oregon again. Mags are plentiful right now . . .So just to be clear......the date of March whatever (15?) is still the Permit date, correct? Who are we waiting on, if anyone?
I could be wrong here but I think the 9th District case relating to the Montana Firearms Freedom Act of 2009; the majority opinion there was basically that the Feds have "sole jurisdiction" on regulating NFA items, but that States could ban them, just not deregulate them within States? Can someone double check?Also something to be aware of is that Virginia is likely to pass a $500 per suppressor tax. That means it could be coming to OR and WA. Wa will pass this as soon as they can imo because it's the FFLs doing their dirty work for them and their MO is already to push commerce based regs.
I've been following this and no, the court doesn't have to make a decision by March, they can take up to several years if they so choose to. I don't know who told you that they have a deadline, but they don't. The only thing that happens in March is the stuff from SB243 about M114 taking affect but even that is on hold till the courts make a ruling and then at least 30 days after that. Tony has already explained this before.Oregon Supreme Court. It is my understanding that March is also the deadline for them to make their ruling on the case. Their ruling could come down any day/any minute, but there is a deadline for when they need to complete it. So that is what we are waiting on. With the stay for M114 in place, nothing goes into effect until that stay is lifted- which could be done by the Oregon Supreme Court. So we wait for them. Buy those standard capacity mags now boys before any decision becomes eminent or other vendors start choosing not to ship to Oregon again. Mags are plentiful right now . . .
Going forward? Or are they deciding that they're going to tax people on item they already have?Also something to be aware of is that Virginia is likely to pass a $500 per suppressor tax. That means it could be coming to OR and WA. Wa will pass this as soon as they can imo because it's the FFLs doing their dirty work for them and their MO is already to push commerce-based regs.
I'm not sure. Maybe a moot date for mag ban to take effect pending Duncan V Bonta? Maybe a moot date for permit system since we're still waiting on OSC?Does all of this mean that, at the moment, March 15 is a moot date for a permit system to take effect?
Correct, M114 as a whole is on hold. However, that doesn't mean they won't try some underhanded BS like they did with SB243. couple attempts were made and failed, but they won't quite trying to screw us over.Does all of this mean that, at the moment, March 15 is a moot date for a permit system to take effect?
OTOH - the court could make a decision tomorrow - so buy cheap & stack deep now.I've been following this and no, the court doesn't have to make a decision by March, they can take up to several years if they so choose to. I don't know who told you that they have a deadline, but they don't. The only thing that happens in March is the stuff from SB143 about M114 taking affect but even that is on hold till the courts make a ruling and then at least 30 days after that. Tony has already explained this before.
As for companies refusing to sell to Oregon, the solution is simple, don't buy anything from them and let others know not to and to buy from a company that still supports Oregon.
Didn't the new Senate bill nullify the mag limits of ip114?OTOH - the court could make a decision tomorrow - so buy cheap & stack deep now.
I don't think so?Didn't the new Senate bill nullify the mag limits of ip114?
Isn't that where the March effective date came from?I don't think so?
Yes but here's the screenshot from SB243 enrolled pdf it doesn't nullify mag limits or permit system, it just amends the dates on which they're effective to March 15th 2026; and I didn't see anything about pending Court decisionsIsn't that where the March effective date came from?
Sorry, I meant nullify until the start date. Carry on.Yes but here's the screenshot from SB243 enrolled pdf it doesn't nullify mag limits or permit system, it just amends the dates on which they're effective to March 15th 2026; and I didn't see anything about pending Court decisionsclick image to enlarge
View attachment 2229290