Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, it's the cartridge specific parts that killed this round in my opinion.I admit to have been rather enamored with the 6.8, but never committed to the build. Then I found the .300BLK and stuck with it. It made more sense to me with having to only change the barrel to convert, and not needing different mags, whereas the 6.8 conversion required a barrel, a bolt, and mags. Additionally, I had and almost inexhaustable supply of 5.56 brass to convert rather than having to buy 6.8 SPC brass. But, to each his own.
Probably not dead, but on life support.I can't get any love for the 6.8, is it dead?
It was more out of curiosity. I've had some 6.8 stuff that wouldn't sell in the classifieds. I'm kind of leaning towards it being my RV gun if it doesn't move, which it really hasn't.I saw mention of the 6.8 in an article recently and wondered the same as the OP. I find the timing of this thread ironic.
I'll bet the 6.8 SPC turns out like a lot of cartridges, 357 Remington Maximum as an example. A few loyal fans that keep it on life support, while the rest of the gun industry moves on.
I think they will all be a niche cartridge for the AR15 except the Grendel, because several companies are making that in bolt hunting rifles, not hard to find those anyways. "They've" been marketing AR15s to the hunting community ("MSR") for many more years now and its not really catching on, IMO from what I see in the field here in Oregon anyways.If you take the 25 WSSM, the barrel life will be much shorter than a 223.
Remington screwed the pooch on the 6.8 introduction, but I suspect it will stay on as a niche cartridge, as @orygun suggests.
Mine shoot from 95 to 130gr bullets well, which is a versatility I appreciate.