Hmm got me thinking

The full document is here.

Freedom From War

It is very clear on targeting nuclear arms and capabilities of invading your neighbors. Especially the US and Soviet Russia. There's nothing in there that could possibly be interpretted as targeting personal freedoms unless you're taking stuff out of context on purpose. It's goal is clearly to reduce the risk of nuclear war and mutual destruction, not target our personal weapons.

 

heres the forbes article he referred to

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty: Are Our 2nd Amendment Rights Part Of The Deal? - Forbes

 

reading the treaty too, check this out:

thankfully Canada says hell no

this is from the 2006 treaty which Pres. Bush refused to sign off on. even Russia sees it as a national security risk. it makes no sense for a country to publicly share its military secrets, especially telling the world what we're packn.

heres the link https://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/ArmsTradeTreaty/

ans as much as that video sounds like a tin foil hat parade they really do mean to disarm all but state powers. it would in fact remove individual citizens from owning weapons to eliminate civil unrest.

i didnt see anything that confirms Obama supporting this but im going to keep looking. it would definitely prove that using the recent mass shootings for moving towards a global power along with eliminating the 2nd amendment.


PS: yes obama is in full support for the treaty as drafted and has undermined the Bush administration's stance on this treaty. Bush opposed it because it would in fact remove the right of citizens to own weapons.

also found a dumbed down article that makes it a bit easier to understand http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dl8qX9nSBI

it is actually a very sly move towards the treaty.