Gold Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,947
- Reactions
- 47,252
Time for some google-fu.
Edit in: Backcountry Hunters and Anglers
They're based out of Montana, have big names in the industry for supporters and are pretty legitimate. However they are staunchly opposed to releasing "federal" land back to the states.
One of my main concerns/causes is the return of land to the counties and out from under federal control and waste.
Their statement has the Bundy occupation twisted up in the actions and sentences given to the Hammonds. The two are separate issues, and the actions of the Bundys are not relevant in the Hammond case. They need to exercise some critical thinking skills.
The Hammonds were prosecuted using anti terrorism laws to ensure a minimum five year sentence. How can they use terrorism laws against people without showing that they were terrorists? When the first Judge felt that the sentences were too harsh he reduced them. Later, sentences served, butt hurt prosecutors talked a second judge into increasing their sentences. How is this right? Does this mean they can go back and increase a traffic ticket I've already paid? How about anybody else that has served their time for an offense - can they just pick the ones they don't like and send them back for more like the Hammonds?