Staff Member
Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 8,905
- Reactions
- 31,434
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The shooter was an unreported prohibited possessor because of federal incompetence and now they want to sue Academy?
Sounds about right.
The suit alleges that the shooter presented a CO DL to buy the weapon in TX and that AR15s are prohibited in CO.
The article posits the theory that the buyer may have told the clerk that he was now a TX resident, but that raises the requirement of presenting an ID w current information.
Is a store clerk supposed to be knowledgable in the nuances of all 50 states' gun restrictions? Online retailers seem to be hip to it and generally restrict sales/shipping to restricted areas on items that are deemed too distasteful for public consumption by the elites.
I'd say that it's up to the buyer to know the laws in their jurisdiction, not the store clerk. That's what I'd say... a jury may not agree.
What's Academy's defense strategy gonna be?
Much like Seattle dumping a million gallons of sewage into the bay...and no one is held accountable.but the .gov didn't do their part.
but the .gov didn't do their part.
and no one is held accountable.
I didn't realize Colorado banned ARs.
They haven't. Only Denver and Boulder have.
How the heck is a clerk in Texas supposed to know that a city several States away banned something?They haven't. Only Denver and Boulder have.
How the heck is a clerk in Texas supposed to know that a city several States away banned something?
How the heck is a clerk in Texas supposed to know that a city several States away banned something?
How the heck is a clerk in Texas supposed to know that a city several States away banned something?