Duncan v. Bonta Round 2 is OUT!

[fmvolume86]

That's the whole gist here, we have been compliant, and we have allowed infringements to the point where we will be loosing what left of our 2nd, so, we have two choices now, we organize and fight back, or we sit on our thumbs and await the SCOTUS pleasure! We all know what the answer here is, it's the same thing that got us here in the first place, we won't do anything because we haven't suffered enough personally, so, it's business as usual, until it ain't, then what?

fighting back can be simply just not complying.... but even that no one has any courage and bends over to tyranny. It's honestly embarassing. I didn't serve my country to then have wanna be dictators tell me what my rights are that are plainly written in our constitution. States can;t just make up their own laws when it comes to the costitution it's that simple.

 

[bcp]

Tell me if my memory is correct here.....

1. California passes magazine ban.
2. Judge Benitez rules ban unconstitutional.
3. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturns Judge Benitez's ruling.
4. 9ths ruling appealed to SCOTUS.
5. SCOTUS sends it back to the lower courts with a "Try again." note attached.
6. Judge Benitez again rules ban unconstitutional.
7. 9th Court of Appeals again overturns Judge Benitez's ruling.
8.
9.

Do I have this correct?

1. California requires magazine disconnect on pistols. Done

2. Circuit Court decides magazines aren't a necessary firearm part and can be banned. Done

3. California bans all detachable magazines. Next?



Bruce

 

[CamoDeafie]

1. California requires magazine disconnect on pistols. Done

2. Circuit Court decides magazines aren't a necessary firearm part and can be banned. Done

3. California bans all detachable magazines. Next?



Bruce

Change 3, to "California bans all firearms that can use any magazines except those with fixed tubular magazines or mag-in-grip of 10 rds or less", with exception for LEO