Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 2,190
- Reactions
- 4,965
Court Strikes Down Biden's 'Ghost Gun Rule' | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of. Course. here we go again....so...again.... Is Congress going to subpoena Diddleback and Merry Garfunkel to hearings before Senate Judiciary and the weaponized Fed Agency Committee?Sunday, the court also granted an injunction on the final frame and receivers rule in the Polymer80 case. Including protection from prosecution for their customers.
Polymer80's response? Today... full kit's are back on sale (frame + jig) for preorder. $99+free shipping.
Alphabets respose to the ruling? They issued a public notice to all FFL's basically stating that they will continue to investigate infractions against any provisions of the final rule, as published. Blah, blah, blah....
ATF Issues Public Safety Advisory to All Federal Firearms Licensees, Manufacturers and Distributors of Firearm Parts, Components, and Accessories | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
WASHINGTON – Today, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives issued a public safety advisory to the firearms industry and the public regarding the application of Final Rule 2021-05F, Definition of “Frame or Receiver” and Identification of Firearms. The advisory highlights the...www.atf.gov
No doubt they will appeal the courts decision, but as of now, they are legal to purchase in their original form... frame+jig kits.
They already did. It's set for the 23rd at 10am ET.Is Congress going to subpoena Diddleback and Merry Garfunkel to hearings before Senate Judiciary and the weaponized Fed Agency Committee?
Um….. maybe your weapon will?Of. Course. here we go again....so...again.... Is Congress going to subpoena Diddleback and Merry Garfunkel to hearings before Senate Judiciary and the weaponized Fed Agency Committee?
Who's gonna enforce District Court injunction against the ATF?
Edit so.. how does this bode for the pistol brace thing... if Courts grants nationwide injunction against ATF/DOJ for enforcing the brace rule.. who's gonna enforce the injunction against ATF...
What percentage of the 104,000,000 gun owners have the mental and intestinal fortitude to fight? remember Jan 6th. Think even a million gun owners gonna be able to band together armed outside every State ATF offices, nationwide?Um….. maybe your weapon will?
It was about the handgun roster thing?Wasn't there a big win in CA today also? It wasn't one of Benitez's. Don't recall what it was for
That sounds right. Don't recall the details.It was about the handgun roster thing?
Wasn't there a big win in CA today also? It wasn't one of Benitez's. Don't recall what it was for
Yes, Sir. The handgun roster thing. Basically stayed the 3 laws that have been preventing any newer model firearms into the state over the past 10-15 years.It was about the handgun roster thing?
The difference is (or will be), the ATF doesn't make laws, they just enforce them. The court can say the agency is overstepping, but it is unlikely to throw out the NFA/GCA/etc.Yet Oregon wants to push ahead with their receiver ban...and other unconstitutional laws.
It's as though legislators, and agencies are actively flipping-off the American people.
...nevertheless... still in violation of the 2A and likely to succeed a challenge.If a legislative body passes a law that says an 80% frame/rx is a gun frame/receiver, then that does have the force of law.
Of course it is unconstitutional, but the court is much less likely to strike down a law that has been in place for 50-90 years....nevertheless... still in violation of the 2A and likely to succeed a challenge.
Agreed though that they are seperate types of challenges.
You mean kinda like Roe v. Wade? longstanding ruling that everyone was sure would never be struck down despite one Party saying that the other side will get rid of for 30+ years; that actually got struck down.Of course it is unconstitutional, but the court is much less likely to strike down a law that has been in place for 50-90 years.
Roe v. Wade wasn't a law, it was a court decision - but yes, the longer a law or precedent is in effect, the harder it is to reverse it in court.You mean kinda like Roe v. Wade?
What does the alphabet not wanting to give up on their rules have to do with actual legality and court orders? So what if they don't like taking a loss and still try to keep pushing the issue. That seems to be par for the course but changes nothing... no matter how they might feel about it. If a court determines it to be unconstitutional and illegal to enforce it... that is the reality. Not the alphabets or brandon's "feelings".The ATF still hasn't conced bumpstocks. They wont on this either. Meanwhile you still cant buy 80% AK receivers anywhere even though 80% AR-15's? No problem.
No one's selling them and won't until the ATF tells them it's OK. It's that simpleWhat does the alphabet not wanting to give up on their rules have to do with actual legality and court orders? So what if they don't like taking a loss and still try to keep pushing the issue. That seems to be par for the course but changes nothing... no matter how they might feel about it. If a court determines it to be unconstitutional and illegal to enforce it... that is the reality. Not the alphabets or brandon's "feelings".
What exactly does retailers not having any of a particluar item available for sale at the moment have anything to do with their legality? You seem to bring up that point over and over again when a new freedom is restored. "Good luck buying one", "you still can't buy any", etc.
What exactly is your point? If retailers don't have something available for sale again yet that means it's still illegal?
At times it can be impossible to find anyone with .22LR AR barrels or some OEM glock parts in stock for months and months on end. Does that mean those items keep dipping in and out of legality?
Or... you're just making a casual observation, like... "good luck finding any in-stock right away."(?) You know inventory doesn't magically appear on retailers shelves the moment a court decisions is entered into the books, right(?) I believe most people are aware of that and fail to see why it's so important to point it out at every opportunity.
In who's world? You mean like the alphabet telling everyone you can't buy an 80% frame or reciever without a SN and going through an FFL, but the courts said, "that's not the way it works"... so retailers are selling them.... despite not having gotten permission from the alphabet agency?No one's selling them and won't until the ATF tells them it's OK. It's that simple