JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Here's the AP News feed that a lot of news (propaganda) agencies are using.

Suprise suprise suprise

 
Here's the AP News feed that a lot of news (propaganda) agencies are using.

The headline itself shows just how shoddy the state of journalism is these days. The USSC expanded nothing, it simply rolled back unconstitutional restrictions on an existing right. Gun control is the only thing we see expanding.
 
Ole Sleepy Joe, doesn't have enough brains left to have written such a speech! It was done for the puppet and all he did was read it!

Here's what's really going on in the Prez's head:

075223506f7b02e16376ac6bdff2bf09sleepy-cat-with-human-eyes-meme.jpg
 
The USSC relies on the Executive Branch to enforce it's rulings, so either Trump or De Santis will enforce beginning Jan 20, 2025.
Would their failure to comply constitute a form of treason? you know that is what the left and the dems would accuse red states of doing if they did not obey a decision that went in their favor (abortion rights for example).
 
Last Edited:
President

Biden "Deeply Disappointed" In SCOTUS Ruling On Open Carry

"This ruling contradicts both common sense and the Constitution, and should deeply trouble us all."

I am pretty sure that the SCOTUS says what is and what is not in the Constitution.



Here's the president's statement:
Look for the dems to try and pack the court now. Only way to use it as a legislative branch now is pack it full of non-constitutionalist liberals….
 
The State of New York has officially stated they do not recognize the Ruling and will not comply! Wonder how that's gonna play out!!!
Is there a reference to this? Great opportunity for citizens to bring suit against the state. Obviously, lots of officials from the City and Albany have their own character issues.
 

Supreme Court Gun Ruling

 

Supreme Court Gun Ruling

The Failing New York Times? Blech.
 
Unfortunately the United States Supreme Court makes a ruling but does not have an enforcement branch to enforce non-carry states to change right? So what if New York State (NYC) and other non-carry states just ignore this ruling? There will be lawsuits of course but it takes a lot of money and time.
 
Unfortunately the United States Supreme Court makes a ruling but does not have an enforcement branch to enforce non-carry states to change right? So what if New York State (NYC) and other non-carry states just ignore this ruling? There will be lawsuits of course but it takes a lot of money and time.
Actually, SCOTUS Does have an enforcement arm, it's the D.O.J. and under them, the U.S. Marshals service, ( Who, if they actually were to do the job for which they are Constitutnally bound) would march into NYC and any other state, city, county, and Arrest anc charge with TREASON the politicos who refuse to enforce a SCOTUS ruling/law!
 
The ignorance is astonishing, just off the top of my head:
  • Concealed weapons weren't involved in that tragedy
  • Had some of the victims been allowed to carry concealed their loved ones might still be alive
 

Upcoming Events

Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR
Arms Collectors of Southwest Washington (ACSWW) gun show
Battle Ground, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top