Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 42,776
- Reactions
- 111,079
'Assault weapon' bans look more legally vulnerable than ever
A preliminary injunction in Illinois may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud.
reason.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know what else is popular with "mass killers"?Let's use Immergut's terrible reasoning to make AWBs "legal"
Pistol grips
Barrel shrouds
Flash hider/muzzle devices
Removable magazines (of more than 10 rounds )
None of them "affect" how semiautomatic rifles functions, and since they are accessories and not "arms" ;
It is "perfectly legal" to prohibit semiautomatic rifles with only one of those features, since they are "rarely used in self defense and are popular with mass killers and criminals", and use the USC's Sporting Clause that banned imports of certain featured semiautomatic rifles as another excuse...
Ahhh HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAA WOW....
I think you are thinking about the WA law? M114 was about mag ban, permits, safety training etc.Let's use Immergut's terrible reasoning to make AWBs "legal"
Pistol grips
Barrel shrouds
Flash hider/muzzle devices
Removable magazines (of more than 10 rounds )
None of them "affect" how semiautomatic rifles functions, and since they are accessories and not "arms" ;
It is "perfectly legal" to prohibit semiautomatic rifles with only one of those features, since they are "rarely used in self defense and are popular with mass killers and criminals", and use the USC's Sporting Clause that banned imports of certain featured semiautomatic rifles as another excuse...
Ahhh HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAA WOW....
Right, I'm just saying Fed Judges in 9th District could use Immergut's terrible, patently wrong decision to make WA, and CA AWBs "legal"I think you are thinking about the WA law? M114 was about mag ban, permits, safety training etc.
But the AWB will be here as soon as they can get it. Bastards will try to get everything they can until civilians completely disarmed. Their main effort right now is to get rid of Thomas on scotus. They know what they are doing right now is simply playing for time and is illegal/unconstitutional.
They will absolutely attempt to do this.Right, I'm just saying Fed Judges in 9th District could use Immergut's terrible, patently wrong decision to make WA, and CA AWBs "legal"
Actually, SCOTUS vacated and remanded it back the 9th Circuit (which could have done the right thing at that level), then the shifty meatheads on the 9th Circuit remanded it back to the District from whence it came and landed back in St. Benitez's lap again to start the ENTIRE PROCESS all over again from scratch…. all to buy time to find some way to discredit or impeach pro-2A judges or Justices before the hatchet falls on anti-2A schemes.They will absolutely attempt to do this.
Or maybe not?
Judge Benitez is going to hand the 9th their asses on the CA ban cases before long, which are already on round 2 after being remanded to the district court by SCOTUS for reconsideration in light of Bruen. The 9th circus will be a real test of how far these meat puppet activist judges are willing to go to defy clear and applicable case law from the Supreme Court. Worst case, they absolutely boof the ruling once again, and SCOTUS intervenes on AWB's & mag bans for good.
Ah, that is correct. At any rate, the 9th will be the last stop for this suite of gun cases out of California before re-escalation to SCOTUS, which may or may not happen. I wouldn't be surprised if so, as they are the furthest along in the time-wasting circus that is the appellate court.Actually, SCOTUS vacated and remanded it back the 9th Circuit (which could have done the right thing at that level), then the shifty meatheads on the 9th Circuit remanded it back to the District from whence it came and landed back in St. Benitez's lap again to start the ENTIRE PROCESS all over again from scratch…. all to buy time to find some way to discredit or impeach pro-2A judges or Justices before the hatchet falls on anti-2A schemes.
It'll also depend on if the 9th wants to use Immergut's mag ban decision as an excuse to vacate Benitez's CA mag ban decision, and also vacate Benitez's AWB decision.Ah, that is correct. At any rate, the 9th will be the last stop for this suite of gun cases out of California before re-escalation to SCOTUS, which may or may not happen. I wouldn't be surprised if so, as they are the furthest along in the time-wasting circus that is the appellate court.
We shall see.Personally, I'm debating whether I would prefer Gavin Newsom or JB Pritzker's name to be forever associated with the death knell of "assault weapon" & mag bans in the United States.
AND IF THEY DON'T .... IF THE SCOTUS doesnt' i want to know what the American people plan on doing?????? NOTHING, they will do nothing because its been 2 decades of infringments after infringments and its all incremental and the American public does nothing.They will absolutely attempt to do this.
Or maybe not?
Judge Benitez is going to hand the 9th their asses on the CA ban cases before long, which are already on round 2 after being remanded to the district court by SCOTUS for reconsideration in light of Bruen. The 9th circus will be a real test of how far these meat puppet activist judges are willing to go to defy clear and applicable case law from the Supreme Court. Worst case, they absolutely boof the ruling once again, and SCOTUS intervenes on AWB's & mag bans for good.