- Messages
- 34
- Reactions
- 3
Ok, we have all been dealing with alotttta crap lately so I thought id, (hopefully) post a question that I find kind of humorous just to think about. ID love your responses.
IF supreme court rulings on the 2nd amendment state that a gun that is commonly in use is protected by the 2nd. The term arms is defined as what? I was thinking how these political morons could ban all guns then go after the archery industry. OR could they ban bows and arrows now because they are not arms? Thus not protected by the 2nd. Or are they? Yeah I know next would be knives,hammers, etc. but since the bow has been in use for eons i just find it curious as to what peoples opionion is... does anyone think it fits, or doesnt fit into the 2nd amendment as arms.
IF supreme court rulings on the 2nd amendment state that a gun that is commonly in use is protected by the 2nd. The term arms is defined as what? I was thinking how these political morons could ban all guns then go after the archery industry. OR could they ban bows and arrows now because they are not arms? Thus not protected by the 2nd. Or are they? Yeah I know next would be knives,hammers, etc. but since the bow has been in use for eons i just find it curious as to what peoples opionion is... does anyone think it fits, or doesnt fit into the 2nd amendment as arms.