- Messages
- 635
- Reactions
- 489
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd love to hear from any men and women about their thoughts feelings and opinions on the 2.0 .40 compact. I am getting one after the first of the year. Leaning towards the 3.6" version of the .40. I will take over for my 1.0 FS 9mm.
That's what she said.The person behind the trigger has much more to do with it than the barrel length.
The 2.0's are great. The grip texture though? Not so much.
That's what she said.
And that.
I meant how easy to shoot it accurately. The one indoor range I've shot at does not have any 2.0 .40's. The only one they carry in a compact is the Glock 23. And a FS 1.0 .40U need to define what u mean by accuracy. Do u mean if both guns were in a vise with same ammo or do you mean how easy it is to shoot accurately?
Sound like a motion of the ocean thing to me... Accuracy is way overrated, if you ask me...The person behind the trigger has much more to do with it than the barrel length.
A place I frequent on the web (that has 800+ members) has cut way down on that saying. I will call them out on it and point them to the "MOA all day long challenge". After that, they go quiet... Hint.. There's always my shooting/proving tree, where we can shoot at the 2" target at 400 yards away. That right there proves if you have a "1/2" group all day long gun. Most can not prove it... Just sayin.."Mine shoots bug-hole half-inch groups all day."
I see a version of this claim so often that it is nauseating. I figured it had just as much credibility on this thread as any other I've seen it on, so figured I'd give it a try.
Sound like a motion of the ocean thing to me... Accuracy is way overrated, if you ask me...
Sound like a motion of the ocean thing to me... Accuracy is way overrated, if you ask me...