Why all the 45 haters? Is it 1911 hate, or 45 hate? I get the capacity issue to an extent. Thats why God invented the Glock 21 and Sig 227. If you can effectively control a 45 in rapid fire, why not? My department has gone back to 9mm mostly for shootability with smaller officers, smaller gun size for smaller officers, and ammo cost. Im confident it will work. But if you can sling 200+ grains of lead and put it where it counts, I dont see why you wouldnt. I think of it more as 1911 hate because no one gives the guy carrying a Sig 220 a hard time.