Wow. Ron Paul.....

[Celtic Armory]

Problem is that you will be wasting your vote for someone that can't possibly win at this point. You need to vote for someone that can win and not siphon your vote off.
That's why I won't vote for a Tea Party candidate, they really don't have that much chance of winning and voting for their candidates MIGHT cause an anti gunner to win.

However if Ron Paul ever shows enough voter support I WILL vote for him!

Deen
NRA Benefactor/Recruiter
WAC member
ACSWW member

It's this attitude that didn't get him in the white house this last time. So many Libertarians and conservative Republicans support his ideas, but fall back on "well, he can't win so I won't vote for him". If everyone who said that had voted for him, he'd be in the White House instead of that Commie Obama.

I supported him and voted for him till the final ballot when he wasn't on there, then I voted for Barr because there's no way in h.e. double hockey sticks I'm voting for the other two dorks.

 

[Martini_Up]

However if Ron Paul ever shows enough voter support I WILL vote for him!

Deen
NRA Benefactor/Recruiter
WAC member
ACSWW member

Stop being a 'follower' and join the leaders. If you like what RP is about, stop selling yourself out and vote your conscience.

Those that prefer gridlock vs. the freight train towards oblivion, think of it like this; Gridlock is only a pause on that same train. You have to turn the train around and that is going to feel radical.

People are conditioned to fear radical and therefor vote with the sheep. On top of that you have the 'political machine' in place that doesn't want radical so it promotes the fear of 'radical change' as well. But when you're on a course for complete socialism (anyone want to argue that isn't the case??) a RADICAL course change is required, not just a pause (gridlock)...

 

[JumpWing]

"Gridlock" is an illusion. Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same dirty coin.

Sure, you can point to an example or two that doesn't fit this, but those are exceptions.

 

[EZLivin]

Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same dirty coin.

Yup, two names for the same "party." Should be called the "Professional Politicians and Political Hacks" party.

 

[g.i. joe]

Problem is that you will be wasting your vote for someone that can't possibly win at this point. You need to vote for someone that can win and not siphon your vote off.
That's why I won't vote for a Tea Party candidate, they really don't have that much chance of winning and voting for their candidates MIGHT cause an anti gunner to win.

However if Ron Paul ever shows enough voter support I WILL vote for him!

Deen
NRA Benefactor/Recruiter
WAC member
ACSWW member

So... your going to vote for the RINO who is kissing BHO's ***??? Does this help you sleep at night, justifying your lack of testicle fortitude? Ball up man, vote for the candidate who supports and upholds the constitution (if you really believe in it) when its not a popular thing to do. Your candidate may or may not win, but you will get more respect where it counts.
And, by "anti-gunner", are you referring to Obama or McCain?:huh:

 

[JungleBoy]

This is great YouTube - Ron Paul vs. Morton Downey, Jr.'s audience 1988

This is the old video from 1983 YouTube - Ron Paul - CIGARETTES better than MONEY!!!

A true American hero.

Like Ron Paul read Lewrockwell.com everyday, Ron Paul does