You have way too much faith in the jackases in black robes. How many idiotic and illogical decisions must they put out before you realise that you'd be better off letting the graduates of clown college decide what is constitutional and what is not.
Do you think DC v Heller and McDonald v Chicago were "idiotic and illogical decisions"? That's what the gun-hating anti-gun rights crowd at Huffington Post thinks, you sound just like one of them. Would you rather have had clowns deciding DC v Heller and McDonald v Chicago, with different outcomes? Those "jackasses in black robes" gave us (by "us" I mean we pro-gun people, maybe you don't include yourself in our group) awesome wins in Heller and McDonald. Those decisions drove a stake right through the heart of any hope for a broad gun ban that the anti-gun rights crowd had. Those decisions crushed their dreams.