This is getting old, Now Indiana is going after guns

[rdb241]

Read More

 

[kmk1012]

It's all about the younger generation not getting raised around firearms. They are perfectly content having a digital arsenal, LOL. Too bad they are voting they way that they have. Maybe only one factor but a large one.

 

[arakboss]

It's like a virus. The whole darn country is going to be infected with this illness before they are done. gunrights snatchers they are:

 

[WoodsPlinker]

It's all that Bloomberg money at work. You'd think he would have better things to do in his retirement aside from attacking his fellow american's rights.

When I see this, I see another social bigotry movement on the wrong side of history.

If the majority opinion infringes on the life liberty and happiness of others is it right or wrong? No matter how many catchy phrases they come up with it's still ugly attack on the basic human rights of their neighbor.

Remember, it was also common sense in America at one time to own slaves, but there were those that recognized the majority was wrong and helped fight for the rights of their fellow humans.

Just because an item or group of people or race may scare you and you don't understand their culture doesn't mean you have the right to hate them and pass laws to attack them.

 

[CountryGent]

The gun grabbers finally figured out during the Obama era that they weren't getting anything moving at the Federal level, so they changed their game to the states. And we're seeing the horrible results of that tactical change.

 

[arakboss]

The gun grabbers finally figured out during the Obama era that they weren't getting anything moving at the Federal level, so they changed their game to the states. And we're seeing the horrible results of that tactical change.

It sure seems like they are getting a lot more wins than we are. I wish the tide would turn and quick or we are going to end up with limited gun rights like the rest of the world

 

[leadcounsel]

I sincerely believe that the uncertainty and growing state-by-state denial of the Federally guaranteed 2A must be stopped by the federal government. It must step in and invalidate anything inconsistent with the 2A.

The upheaval of citizens' rights overnight is unacceptable and would not be allowed for other rights. Imagine if state XYZ said that black people cannot vote, or that women cannot get married, etc. The feds would immediately shut that down.

 

[Stomper]

I sincerely believe that the uncertainty and growing state-by-state denial of the Federally guaranteed 2A must be stopped by the federal government. It must step in and invalidate anything inconsistent with the 2A.

The upheaval of citizens' rights overnight is unacceptable and would not be allowed for other rights. Imagine if state XYZ said that black people cannot vote, or that women cannot get married, etc. The feds would immediately shut that down.

^^^This right here.^^^

 

[ZigZagZeke]

It sure seems like they are getting a lot more wins than we are. I wish the tide would turn and quick or we are going to end up with limited gun rights like the rest of the world

If we could get 80% of gun owners to vote we would win every election. Sadly, gun owners are among the least likely people to vote at maybe 40% tops.

 

[Ruger Rich]

It's all about the younger generation not getting raised around firearms. They are perfectly content having a digital arsenal, LOL. Too bad they are voting they way that they have. Maybe only one factor but a large one.

Well spoken

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

we're all gonna have to take our 2 weeks paid vacation and go full boogaloo to restore order and set'm straight

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

If we could get 80% of gun owners to vote we would win every election. Sadly, gun owners are among the least likely people to vote at maybe 40% tops.

yep and when its too late they get all huffy and puffy. i get it. ive been sayin it for years. gun owners are the most divided "group of people" out there. not everyone is die hard 2A and take our rights for granted. some people own guns and have no clue what is going on at the state or federal level and just comply.

 

[Goosebrown]

If we could get 80% of gun owners to vote we would win every election. Sadly, gun owners are among the least likely people to vote at maybe 40% tops.

I think that's BS. Gin people are very likely to vote but for a lot of them guns aren't the only issue. I'd like to see reputable stats on that claim with voting percentages. I want to be wrong.

 

[rdb241]

I think that's BS. Gin people are very likely to vote but for a lot of them guns aren't the only issue. I'd like to see reputable stats on that claim with voting percentages. I want to be wrong.

That may be true for some people. But hands down. Your second amendment rights are more important that anything else. It trumps health care, minimum wage, what gender you are, what ever you want to insert.

 

[OldTengu]

we're all gonna have to take our 2 weeks paid vacation and go full boogaloo to restore order and set'm straight

Like I said yesterday; just call me Turbo:

Ready for the boogaloo.

 

[CountryGent]

I sincerely believe that the uncertainty and growing state-by-state denial of the Federally guaranteed 2A must be stopped by the federal government. It must step in and invalidate anything inconsistent with the 2A.

The upheaval of citizens' rights overnight is unacceptable and would not be allowed for other rights. Imagine if state XYZ said that black people cannot vote, or that women cannot get married, etc. The feds would immediately shut that down.

Agreed, completely. There is a responsibility for federal intervention when the enumerated rights of citizens are being deliberately trampled on by their state.

 

[arakboss]

It sure seems like they are getting a lot more wins than we are. I wish the tide would turn and quick or we are going to end up with limited gun rights like the rest of the world

It doesn't help when much of the editorial space in newspapers goes to jokers like this without rebuttal:

"I've been seeing signs along the highways for an organization called Oregon Pushback, claiming that: "Legislators want to take your guns."

Gun access restrictions actually being discussed by legislators would apply to: 1) felons, 2) mentally unstable persons, and 3) confirmed domestic abusers.

My question: What are those displaying these signs trying to tell us about themselves?"

Source: Oregon Pushback claims suggest concerning reality

 

[arakboss]

Add New Hampshire to the list:

 

[DivCurlGrad72]

As I mentioned in this post: good to know what's going on the rest of the country with respect to 2A, but I'm guessing that Indiana residents, like NC, don't have to worry (at this point in time) about their state government trying to take away their 2A rights:

Governor is Republican


The author of SB 203, Sen. Greg Taylor, is - wait for it - a Democrat.

 

[ZigZagZeke]

I think that's BS. Gin people are very likely to vote but for a lot of them guns aren't the only issue. I'd like to see reputable stats on that claim with voting percentages. I want to be wrong.

So 67% of voters bothered to vote in the most recent general election in Oregon. There are about 3 million voters in Oregon. There are about 1.3 million gun owners in Oregon. Now, if 2/3 of non-gun owners voted that's about 1.17 million votes. Remember those 1.3 million gun owners? If they all voted and voted as a block they would out vote the 2/3 of non-gun owners.