- Messages
- 2,848
- Reactions
- 8,652
I think you're taking a very short view of things, MIC.I don't understand the fascination with colonizing other planets, or living in space.
Maybe the idea of distributed human diaspora if the earth is annihilated by a space object?
Won't help any of us.
Even if our environment were to collapse, even if we tried to nuke everyone, what's left is still more habitable than alien planets. You'd have population collapse, but many would survive.
All of the tech and resources required to sustain life on an alien planet could instead be used on a wrecked Earth, still a better option.
Seems like a fancy idea for rich people. Living in space or on Mars for a lifetime would SUCK.
(unless the space babes were hot)
Can you imagine how much better off our Earth would be if we could mine and refine all or most of our raw materials from the Moon or from the asteroid belt?
How do you know that? Have you been out there and seen what's available in the vastness of the universe? The same thing that pushed men to cross oceans and continents, the drive to discover, is what drives us towards space. First towards the near planets and then further as our technology develops. Did you know that without our space program modern medicine and electronics would not exist? Those early programs have more than paid for themselves from a simply fiscal standpoint, not to mention the lives saved through what has been developed for modern medicine.what's left is still more habitable than alien planets
Here's an interesting article you might enjoy;
The Case for Human Space Exploration - New Space Economy
Human space exploration has always captivated the imagination of humanity, serving as both a symbol of ambition and a driver of innovation. While robotic missions are invaluable, the presence of humans in space exploration offers distinct advantages that cannot be replicated by machines. These...
newspaceeconomy.ca