Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Especially since they are apparently used in every "mass shooting". And since we apparanently have something like 47 "mass shootings" every day, seems pretty common use to me!I can't believe he said they aren't in common use. Such blatant bias
Ok….that was good.Wait till they learn about a keyboard and what it's done for the 1st amendment!
Exactly. I don't see them writing all this with a quill, ink and paper. If the opinions and laws that follow use the "advanced technology" then it must apply to everything.Wait till they learn about a keyboard and what it's done for the 1st amendment!
People just recently progressed to throwing stones as fast as they could pick them up.As opposed to a katana which "allows" one to loop heads off as fast as one can swing that biotch. Guess what bubblegums, people have been slaying people since people have been around and the ridiculous concept of "civilized humanity" doesn't mean chit compared to historical fact.
And we haven't lost them. In fact, we are being limited to semiauto rifles that are similar to the ones you are referencing.and you have been able to fire as fast as you can pull the trigger since the first double action revlvers in the 1800's and semi auto rifles were all the rage just after the turn of the century.
Or present day reality.As opposed to a katana which "allows" one to loop heads off as fast as one can swing that biotch. Guess what bubblegums, people have been slaying people since people have been around and the ridiculous concept of "civilized humanity" doesn't mean chit compared to historical fact.
We haven't lost them because we are following the rules and playing nicely. Our rights and property are under constant attack by government.And we haven't lost them. In fact, we are being limited to semiauto rifles that are similar to the ones you are referencing.
1. Restrictions on dangerous and unusual arms, yes. Outright banning those in common use such as those in question, no. Both Heller and Bruen stated this unequivocally.It seems like there are two problems:
1. The historical tradition of regulation aspect, which means that regulation of firearms is okay as long as it doesn't erase the fundamental right. Heller accepted Miller. Bruen references Heller. Restrictions on arms is not against the Constitution.
2. That semiautomatic rifles haven't been banned. WA residents can buy a Remington 7400 today if they wish. They just can't buy one with certain additions. Those banned additions are the regulation, not the semiautomatic function itself.
So it might be an uphill battle to show that a citizen who can buy a semiautomatic rifle legally is being deprived of a right that the court holds to be limited.