Diamond Supporter
Platinum Supporter
Gold Lifetime
Silver Lifetime
Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 3,980
- Reactions
- 9,954
I prefer 686 (.357 mag) or 629 Classic (.44 mag) revolvers with 6" barrels for most uses. Target shooting, plinking, woods carry casual concealed, woods carry open, or home defense. Both these revolvers have heavy under lugged barrels and are muzzle-heavy in even the snubby models. I like that because weight distributed more toward the muzzle is most effective in absorbing recoil. Even my 2 1/2" 686 is fun to shoot with any load, for example. The muzzle-heavy balance also lets my hand know where the muzzle is for point shooting of various types, such as hip shooting, especially with a 6" gun. I find these guns a bit unwieldy even for target shooting in 8" versions when shooting with one hand. Its not just the muzzle heavy balance. Its also the total weight of the gun. But they are still fine for shooting with two hands for me. For SD I strongly prefer 6" barrels because longer barrels are counterproductive if the attacking bad human or cougar or bear is right on you or nearly so. And it takes longer to move a gun with more weight and a longer barrel. These revolvers with 6" barrels are also the longest that I can carry on my waist without needing to remove the gun or gun belt to sit down.
For me, a barrel longer than 6" becomes advantageous only for scoped guns. By the time I have added a scope the gun is too bulky to carry concealed or without a special holster or sling. And too heavy for me to shoot easily with one hand. So why not add a few more inches of barrel length and get the higher velocities (and flatter trajectories)?
For me, a barrel longer than 6" becomes advantageous only for scoped guns. By the time I have added a scope the gun is too bulky to carry concealed or without a special holster or sling. And too heavy for me to shoot easily with one hand. So why not add a few more inches of barrel length and get the higher velocities (and flatter trajectories)?
Last Edited: