Ruger 10/22 question

Discussion in 'Rifle Discussion' started by soberups, Jun 6, 2010.

  1. soberups

    soberups
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    1,420
    Its my understanding that, over the years, Ruger has been replacing metal parts in its 10/22's with plastic ones. Are the old Rugers any "better" than the newer ones, or are the plastic parts equal in quality to the metal ones they replaced? Is there a particular year or serial # range that is preferable in terms of quality and resale value?
     
  2. Izzy

    Izzy
    Oakridge
    Active Member

    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    85
    It's all personal choice. the plastic stuff is just as tuff as the aluminum.
    You can't polish plastic, other than that (in my opinion) they are equal.
     
  3. Seafarinman

    Seafarinman
    Washington State
    Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bought one of the "plastic" 10/22's a couple months ago and ended up swapping in a spare old aluminum trigger housing and a Power custom trigger and volquartsen hammer as polishing the sear and hammer didn't improve the trigger pull like it does with the older all metal 10/22 rifles.
     
  4. Izzy

    Izzy
    Oakridge
    Active Member

    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    85
    I am NOT an expert, but I have done five trigger jobs on Ruger 10/22s. four were metal housings & one was polymer, all turned out very nice.
    I had no problem getting the triggers to perform the way I wanted (metal & polymer)

    Like I said before it's all personal preference!!:thumbup:
     
  5. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder
    Ardenwald, OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,278
    Likes Received:
    185
    I think the composite housing are more accurate in their dimensions, at least that's what Ruger claims. I've worked on both and don't see much difference other the the base material.
     

Share This Page