Rittenhouse Breakdown by Legal Eagle

[Will_White]

Actually pretty unbiased.

Read More

 

[Nosferatu]

Everybody needs their Youtube ($$) time on this now.

 

[johnly]

Excellent information discussed without hype.

 

[Nick Burkhardt]

Legal Eagle has a strong Left leaning bias. Gague Gross@#$ lied on the stand when he said that he thought that Kyle was an active shooter. In his own video Gague ran along side Kyle and attempted to interview him for clicks and likes. Gague would NOT have been justified in shooting Kyle because 1) he was not in fear for his life, 2) Kyle was not actively nor indiscriminately shooting, 3) Gague was not targeted until HE approached Kyle with his illegally carried pistol out, and finally 4) why not take a shot earlier from a distance to stop the active shooter?

 

[Diamondback]

Andrew Branca is better.

 

[Xaevian]

Did I fall through a time portal? Has the trial not been decided in this alternate universe?

Spoiler alert: he is found not guilty on all charges. Double jeopardy and all, that is the end.

 

[Gbirk]

California lawyer gonna California.

I used to watch legal eagle because it was interesting, but his videos during the Trump years were like the media coverage during the trial. They showed how bad his biases were.

 

[Ranb]

So this lawyer explains what the law says on certain matters. Do you disagree with what the law says or what the lawyer says.

 

[Hueco]

Andrew Branca is better.

Branca is to the right what Legal Eagle is to the left.

After watching all of them, if I were to pick just one, NateTheLawyer would get my vote.

 

[Nick Burkhardt]

Andrew Branca wrote the book Law of Self Defense, Legal Eagle sells suits and does movie reviews.

 

[CRBMoA]

Everybody needs their Youtube ($$) time on this now.

QFT

 

[Stomper]

Everybody needs their Youtube ($$) time on this now.

Brown circular opinions….. everyone has 'em.

 

[Will_White]