Revolver Trigger Locks...Love Em or Hate Em?

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by freestoneangler, Dec 24, 2014.

S&W Trigger Locks -- Love Them or Hate Them?

  1. I love them

  2. I hate them

  3. Either is OK

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. freestoneangler

    freestoneangler
    wa
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    685
    I'm in the market for a S&W .357, most likely a 686 Plus in 3 or 4 inch. I'm seeing lots of posts on Gun Broker, etc. with the "pre-lock" notation. Not knowing the specific history on this, my brief research found this good article on the subject. As suspected, it was a company response to appease the anti-gun crowd. I guess if one was inclined to leave a loaded gun around or an unloaded gun with ammo in plain sight, having the lock does add a back-up level of safety... but that presumes the ding-dong who leaves loaded guns around remembers to use the trigger lock.

    http://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/smith-and-wesson-internal-lock/

    What is your opinion on trigger locks? Have you avoided purchase of S&W revolvers that have them? Aside from the aesthetics and any possible malfunction they might introduce (which sounds like a non-issue?), not sure it would drive what gun I buy, but curious what others think. (Please see my thread in Handgun forum -- soliciting advice on which model...help me spend my money :D).
     
    Sgt Nambu likes this.
  2. orygun

    orygun
    West Linn
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    4,835
    Likes Received:
    4,682
    I didn't vote because I can't say I hate them, but I'd prefer a gun to not have one. Ruger single actions have one of the best. If you want to be able to activate it, you either need to remove the grips or drill a hole in one of the grip panels. At least I didn't have to look at a key hole.

    I think trigger locks are stupid.
     
  3. trainsktg

    trainsktg
    Portland OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,673
    Likes Received:
    829
    Ruger removed the LCR's internal lock in early 2014 if that says anything. I would prefer not to own a pistol with one even though the chance of it inadvertently activating are probably very remote. Just one more thing to go wrong.

    Keith
     
    Dyjital, Flopsweat and IronMonster like this.
  4. IronMonster

    IronMonster
    Free Idaho!
    Opinionated Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    5,768
    Likes Received:
    12,310
    Its added stuff to go wrong that has absolutely no value or upside to me. I would avoid (and have) any with such a feature.
     
  5. filsonhand

    filsonhand
    In the Silicon Forest
    Smooth as a Rhino 2015 Volunteer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    THEY SUCK !!!!!!
    IVE SEEN ONE FAIL ON A SMITH 460 RENDERING THE GUN USELESS.. Smith was quick to fix the issue,but my buddie sold it and bought a ruger alaskan,as it was his primary woods carry and he didn't trust it anymore :(
    I haven't had any issues on my governor,but that is the only revolver I have a lock on cause I didn't have a choice.
     
    Dyjital likes this.
  6. Sgt Nambu

    Sgt Nambu
    PDX OR
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    10,144
    Likes Received:
    21,186
    I have intentionally not purchased a S&W with a lock, much because the deal wasn't perfect but the lock didn't help the sale either! I would buy a lockable S&W in the right deal but I won't carry one!
     
  7. Flopsweat

    Flopsweat
    Slightly right of center
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,072
    Likes Received:
    5,396
    I know how to lock up a gun, so I have no need for one. I have never used the trigger locks on any of my guns other than to verify functionality.
     
  8. MarkAd

    MarkAd
    Port Orchard
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    650
    I have one smith wwith aa triiger lock, but have no key and no desire to even test it
     
  9. Wood Worker

    Wood Worker
    Linn County Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    52
    I had a smith 642 with no lock and it was a dream, sold it to someone who needed it more than me, they love it. Later on in life bought an 642 with lock, I didn't like it one bit, I think that the trigger pull was much harder and I have no use for locks. Sold it and bought an old model 66 in .357 and love that one, never want to sell it, plan on keeping it till I am no longer around.

    That was my experience, and I learned by it, others may have different results.
     
  10. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,312
    <- Why there aren't any school shootings in Israel!
    Teacher with long gun slung over her shoulder!!!

    I don't know, I don't have any revolvers with them.

    Deen
    NRA Life Member, Benefactor Level
    NRA Golden Eagle member
    Defender of Freedom Award
    Washington Arms Collector Member
    Vancouver Rifle & Pistol Club member

    "A gun is like a parachute. If you need one and don't have it, you'll probably never need one again!"
     
  11. SKN

    SKN
    Keizer, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    25
    A little off topic but about revolver locks: as a working CA LEO in the '70s got into 2 knock-down, drag out, roll around on the sidewalk fights where my SW 6" M19 was the object of takeaway attempts. One, with a Hoyt break front, was stopped with a generous dose of Kel-o-caine; the other, where the M19 was in a clam shell, ceased when I accessed my back-up and thrust it sharply under the perpetrator's chin with my pronouncement to him that "it's over!".

    These events prompted me to have a LASD armorer install a safety activated by the cylinder release that oriented much like a 1911 safety: up/on, down/off. When the agency went to SW39/59 series of semis I still appreciated the mag disconnect feature even through the evolutions of double and triple retention holster systems.

    All my SW revolvers (4) are 'pre-lock', including my duty M19, and though both my kids (ages 16 and 12) have been trained I don't leave loaded firearms openly laying around.
     
    freestoneangler likes this.
  12. Hook686

    Hook686
    Northern California
    Active Member

    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    227
    Love, hate I consider the two primary emotions behund all other emotions. Pretty powerful I'm thinking. I love my girlfriend, my kids, my grandkids, my service dog, but things ? I cannot say I love things, not even beer. I like/dislike things, but love. Pretty strong emotion. I have the lock on my S&W revolvers. I am okay with it. Actually it offers another level of safety if I am lazy and leave a revolver on my bench and the grand kids drop by for an unexpected visit. I don't get parnoid when I find I suffered a senior moment and left the 686 on the bench. So, I'd probably prefer to have the lock in my correct phase in my life, but would not miss it if my revolvers did not have one.
     
  13. Liberty97045

    Liberty97045
    Oregon City
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    745
    Likes Received:
    609
    The clam shell style can be quickly removed with a small penknife. You can release the ratchet pawl with any small tools slipped between the trigger guard and the lock. I figured this out when I was 12.

    Better stick with the ones that lock through the barrel or through the frame or better yet, a ready access box.
     
  14. rodell

    rodell
    Newcastle, WA
    Active Member

    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    47
    I have revolvers with and without the internal lock.

    I remove the lock and place a flush plug in the hole. Looks just fine and I don't have to worry about inadvertent locking.

    When S&W first put them on I, like many others, was put off. Now I don't care.
     
  15. BlindedByScience

    BlindedByScience
    Vancouver WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    596
    I have a 642 with a lock that has been back to Cylinder and Slide for 'the works'. It's never been a problem, I've almost forgotten it's there. My Taurus .357 is the same; yes it has a lock, no it's never been a problem. Would I prefer wheel guns without the lock, sure. Am I concerned about the locks I have....no.
     
  16. Mongo1

    Mongo1
    Santiam Canyon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    166
    You are all free to use any trigger lock you chose. I don't use any.
     
  17. Dyjital

    Dyjital
    Albany, Ore
    Flavorite Member Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,537
    Likes Received:
    10,359
    Revolvers aren't supposed to have locks!

    While it is cliche like... I have guns without safeties and trigger locks for a reason (except a few that there is nothing I can do about)...

    Otherwise this is the second most important thing behind only what's between your ears:

    image.jpg

    image.jpg
     
    Heywood and AndyinEverson like this.
  18. Velzey

    Velzey
    Estacada Gunsmith
    Büchsenmacher Bronze Vendor

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    5,768
    Worst thing ever! I'm not going to bash MFG's here..BUT good grief. I have had revolvers all of a sudden stop working...Yep lock engaged itself.

    I had one just last week, a very common new carry gun. The none lock version. Guess what, the polymer frame didn't have the hole in it for the lock....But the internals still had the lock mechanism in place! Can you guess what this CCW pistol decided to do while being fired? It locked itself up tight....I mean like someone engaged the internal lock.....
    So disappointed to see that! o_O
     
    Sgt Nambu and titsonritz like this.
  19. Velzey

    Velzey
    Estacada Gunsmith
    Büchsenmacher Bronze Vendor

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    5,768
    smith.jpg
     
    Sgt Nambu and titsonritz like this.
  20. Certaindeaf

    Certaindeaf
    SE Portland
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,361
    Likes Received:
    17,759
    You know what's really sweet are those cross-bolt "safeties" on single action revolvers and lever guns. yea!
    I fear S&W is going to go out of business soon and catering to California is stoopit.
     
    Velzey likes this.

Share This Page