Gold Lifetime
- Messages
- 3,873
- Reactions
- 3,805
background Checks. [CeaseFire O] distributes this information believed to be linked to LC 154. Below are their talking points to support LC 154,
Claim: Will lead to gun registry.
Nothing in this bill creates a registry. State police must already destroy background records within five
years--and in practice do so sooner.
Claim: Will Lead to Gun Confiscation.
There are no proposals to confiscate guns.
The Oregon Firearms Federation, chief proponent to this point, made the same argument in 2000 to try to
block checks at gun shows.
Claim: Background Check to Rent at a Range or Lend a Gun for Hunting.
[Proposed legislation will only require a background check at transfer, which is defined in the law as a permanent
transfer--not rental or loaner].
ORS CITATION/ STATUTORY LANGUAGE.
CLAIM: PUNISHES LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, DOESN'T STOP CRIMINALS.
Oregon's 25 year old system works. In 2012, background checks stopped the sale of 2,378 guns to people with
a criminal background.
Responsible gun ownership includes making sure you don't sell or give a gun to someone that will use in a crime..
CLAIM: Colorado Proves Voters Will Punish Support for Background Checks.
The voters of Oregon overwhelmingly support background checks and will support candidates that help keep guns
out of the hands of criminals.
Background checks were a central issue in Virginia's attorney general race. As the winning campaign manager
wrote in the Washington Post:
In the end, voters were calling out for action on gun violence, and they flocked to the candidate who offered
progress and a sensible, mainstream approach to protecting Virginians.
SUGGESTION: When addressing members of the LC 154 committee {keeping in mind that for some of the members on the committee, are honest, but with respect to the others, LC represents the liars and cheats. The above may be talking points that can be countered in email or phone calls. Good luck with this.
Claim: Will lead to gun registry.
Nothing in this bill creates a registry. State police must already destroy background records within five
years--and in practice do so sooner.
Claim: Will Lead to Gun Confiscation.
There are no proposals to confiscate guns.
The Oregon Firearms Federation, chief proponent to this point, made the same argument in 2000 to try to
block checks at gun shows.
Claim: Background Check to Rent at a Range or Lend a Gun for Hunting.
[Proposed legislation will only require a background check at transfer, which is defined in the law as a permanent
transfer--not rental or loaner].
ORS CITATION/ STATUTORY LANGUAGE.
CLAIM: PUNISHES LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, DOESN'T STOP CRIMINALS.
Oregon's 25 year old system works. In 2012, background checks stopped the sale of 2,378 guns to people with
a criminal background.
Responsible gun ownership includes making sure you don't sell or give a gun to someone that will use in a crime..
CLAIM: Colorado Proves Voters Will Punish Support for Background Checks.
The voters of Oregon overwhelmingly support background checks and will support candidates that help keep guns
out of the hands of criminals.
Background checks were a central issue in Virginia's attorney general race. As the winning campaign manager
wrote in the Washington Post:
In the end, voters were calling out for action on gun violence, and they flocked to the candidate who offered
progress and a sensible, mainstream approach to protecting Virginians.
SUGGESTION: When addressing members of the LC 154 committee {keeping in mind that for some of the members on the committee, are honest, but with respect to the others, LC represents the liars and cheats. The above may be talking points that can be countered in email or phone calls. Good luck with this.