Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 24,329
- Reactions
- 56,140
K, so how much "deflation" will happen, if any?
SSA COLA says 2.5% up for people getting SS benefits for 2025 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We won't see much deflation when the Trump tariff bonanza starts. Unless your income is 95th percentile+, you gonna feel it real good.K, so how much "deflation" will happen, if any?SSA COLA says 2.5% up for people getting SS benefits for 2025
![]()
Due to our decades long reliance on importing things.We won't see much deflation when the Trump tariff bonanza starts. Unless your income is 95th percentile+, you gonna feel it real good.
I agree, fully. Not just manufacturing but dependence on others for various commodities, like lithium, and consumer goods.Due to our decades long reliance on importing things.
My opinion, when bad things happen globally, war, pandemic, etc, we really are exposed to our own lack of manufacturing. For some reason, a lot of people intentionally deny, downplay or ignore that fact. I think it's a bigger issue than the strength of our military.
I would trust that a smart man like President Trump, (God it feels good to type that!) would enlist many very smart people to think the tariff situation out well before hand. Unlike the boobs for the last 4 years just doing it with out forethought.

After we refill our Strategic Oil Reserves and get the military a bit more on it's feet.US should flood the world market with crude oil and gas.....cut Russian and Iranian income.
Diplomacy via blunt force trauma...
OPEC may do that for us.US should flood the world market with crude oil and gas.....cut Russian and Iranian income.
Diplomacy via blunt force trauma...
The Jones Act had good intentions, but time has passed it by. Perhaps keeping American crews, and letting vessels be purchased from overseas and other adjustments.Hopefully we can get rid of The Jones Act of 1920.
If we are to have energy independence in this country, the east coast shouldn't be buying energy from across the Atlantic. The Gulf Coast could be shipping that product to the east coast instead of exporting it. This will become more relevant when we start applying tariffs to petroleum imports and other countries start applying tariffs on our exported petroleum products.The Jones Act had good intentions, but time has passed it by. Perhaps keeping American crews, and letting vessels be purchased from overseas and other adjustments.
My wife works at an elementary school and is on PERS. My main hunting buddy is a retired teacher on PERS TIER 1. I don't blame them. Other than they both belong/belonged to the union. The unions and the non-arms-length negotiations with the government, that was a problem. Those folks on TIER 1 with the "if the market gains 20%, you get 20%, but if it loses 20%, you only get 10%" (not the actual figures, but I'm too lazy to look it up) agreement. What kind of an idiot would agree to that? My buddy told me how much he had in his PERS account when he retired in his 50's, how they doubled that at retirement, and how much he gets monthly. I ran some quick calculations and told him, "The taxpayers needed you to die five years ago to break even". His response, "What would that matter? When I die, my wife gets it until she dies." The math just doesn't work on that program. It doesn't even pass the sniff test. My wife's plan? She's on the low end of the totem pole and is looking at chump change.
The main problem is the guaranteed payouts. Investments don't make guaranteed gains. The payouts should not have been guaranteed either. The beneficiaries would probably be more critical of those responsible for making the investments, if their payouts depended on the performance. Instead taxpayers will end up making up most of the shortfalls.My wife works at an elementary school and is on PERS. My main hunting buddy is a retired teacher on PERS TIER 1. I don't blame them. Other than they both belong/belonged to the union. The unions and the non-arms-length negotiations with the government, that was a problem. Those folks on TIER 1 with the "if the market gains 20%, you get 20%, but if it loses 20%, you only get 10%" (not the actual figures, but I'm too lazy to look it up) agreement. What kind of an idiot would agree to that? My buddy told me how much he had in his PERS account when he retired in his 50's, how they doubled that at retirement, and how much he gets monthly. I ran some quick calculations and told him, "The taxpayers needed you to die five years ago to break even". His response, "What would that matter? When I die, my wife gets it until she dies." The math just doesn't work on that program. It doesn't even pass the sniff test. My wife's plan? She's on the low end of the totem pole and is looking at chump change.