Other State Oblitered serial number charges found unconstitutional!

[Yarome]

Wow! Interesting stuff!

In a court case, the charge of being in possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number was thrown out based on the SCOTUS Bruen decision. Text and history did not require a firearm to be serialized. Crats... minds are gonna BLOW!!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wvsd.234171/gov.uscourts.wvsd.234171.48.0.pdf

It makes you wonder how far it goes and if it won't neuter the alphabets and FFL procedures, hu.

Read More

 

[The Heretic]

Ban on guns with serial numbers removed is unconstitutional -U.S. judge

A federal judge in West Virginia has ruled that a federal ban on possessing a gun with its serial number removed is unconstitutional, the first such ruling since the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically expanded in June.

www.reuters.com

 

[ma96782]

Hummmm........ NFA.

Aloha, Mark

 

[trevi]

Come on,...... Drop the NFA/GCA! So close, i can taste it!

 

[Stomper]

Come on,...... Drop the NFA/GCA! So close, i can taste it!

Eeeeeewwww…… need a breath mint?

 

[Yarome]

Come on,...... Drop the NFA/GCA! So close, i can taste it!

You kiss your mother with that mouth???

 

[Yarome]

This could also have impact challenging the rule that 80% must also be serialized prior to sale. Besides the obvious, it would sure be nice to avoid the associated serialization fees as well.

Severely undermine the alphabets efforts to populate their gun registry to boot.

Can't wait to see that one challenged.

 

[Nosferatu]

There it is folks! Go grind off those serial numbers!

A good video on the subject by someone who isn't a bloviating bloviator:

 

[nwslopoke]

Come on,...... Drop the NFA/GCA! So close, i can taste it!

Only in this club. Normies in large numbers, have no idea it even exists. They only know what their phone tells them is important.

My neighborhood of 20 years, is the most decorated with props and all than anytime before. Several hundreds worth of stuff. It may be for the children but save the tears 2 months from now.

 

[po18guy]

Hummmm........ NFA.

Aloha, Mark

Freddie Mercury was a self-fulfilling prophet.

 

[JRuby]

To me this is slippery slope. Serial numbers weren't required when the 2A was written, what else wasn't around with the 2A? I see this as a mixed blessing.

 

[The Heretic]

To me this is slippery slope. Serial numbers weren't required when the 2A was written, what else wasn't around with the 2A? I see this as a mixed blessing.

The NFA (1934)

The GCA (1968)

The Hughes Amendment to the FOPA (1986)

Bump stock ban

Pistol brace ban

 

[JRuby]

The NFA (1934)

The GCA (1968)

The Hughes Amendment to the FOPA (1986)

Bump stock ban

Pistol brace ban

30 round magazines?

 

[Yarome]

The NFA (1934)

The GCA (1968)

The Hughes Amendment to the FOPA (1986)

Bump stock ban

Pistol brace ban

Rewind all the infringments? I fail to see the problem.

 

[JRuby]

Rewind all the infringments? I fail to see the problem.

If it did not exist back then it's illegal now. Maybe I am interpreting this wrong if you use that time frame as the standard. I just don't trust the legal system to work in the 2A favor. I sure hope I am wrong.
.

 

[Alexx1401]

Wow, if it stands certainly sounds like they would have to back down on the 80% then.

 

[Yarome]

Wow, if it stands certainly sounds like they would have to back down on the 80% then.

You would hope, but I doubt it. Even if the criminal charge drops off the books FFL's are still obligated to follow alphabet polices under threat of losing their license. Until the alphabet rule itself is challenged, I'm afraid we're stuck with it.

 

[JohnnyMac]

 

[po18guy]

Sullivan Act NY 1911
GCA-68'
Bartley-Fox law MA 1975
See how crime has plummeted since then?
Me neither.

 

[JohnnyMac]

If it did not exist back then it's illegal now.

I get where you're going with that. I suppose (playing the devil's advocate) one could surmise that the script could be flipped back on firearm owners by saying that since certain items did not exist back in 1791, they wouldn't be covered by the 2A and can be legally infringed upon....Way too much lawyer-ese for a chit-kicker like me to figure out, but I do think the law works in mysterious ways.

Couple things off the top of my that didn't exist in 1791:
Semi-auto firearms
Primer fired cartridges
Magazines (as mentioned before)
Laser sights/Red Dots
Suppressors