O well if they are not armed then OK- Tards

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by DMax, Feb 14, 2013.

  1. DMax

    DMax
    Yamhill
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    2,933
  2. Viper84

    Viper84
    Bellingham, WA
    Member

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    29
    So I shouldnt be able to own something thats similar to a select fire weapon, but the government can monitor its citizens with ACTUAL war equipment??

    Seems legit...
     
  3. rur862

    rur862
    Seattle
    Active Member

    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    165
    Post Deleted.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2014
    chariot13 and (deleted member) like this.
  4. James 61

    James 61
    Clark Co Washington
    Member

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    23
    Loved the comment about rules governing the release of weapons from civil aircraft. They can guarantee that civil aircraft are unarmed but what they don't tell you is that they have no control over military aircraft manned or unmanned and as we all know it is military aircraft that the government and by extension the president has control of. Nice piece of rhetoric to calm the proles down with.
     
  5. chariot13

    chariot13
    Near Eugene/Springfield
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    595
    Being subject to search anywhere outside your house is being a subject. I wont even start with the governments ability regarding ground penetrating radar through homes coupled to thermal (heat) imaging. How do you think they saw the warm blood splattered on the wall regarding dorner. Satellites , drones, sitting in your home uninvited... all the same
     
  6. chariot13

    chariot13
    Near Eugene/Springfield
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    595
    The earth has been nothing more than a zoo. With those watching, dictating if you'll live a day or two
     

Share This Page