JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
680
Reactions
1,266
I'm a bit of a wiser man than to make public threats, but I'm also a bit surprised at this case:
http://www.mailtribune.com/news/201...ama-on-twitter-faces-up-to-60-years-in-prison
With social media, and the abundance of opinions(o_O)that are as thin as the screen they're viewed on, I wonder if there isn't a 1st amendment issue here. A verbal threat, with no evidence of a plan to carry it out, is just talking mean as far as I'm concerned. Obviously, since this guy owns guns (oh no!) someone (socialist/activist) might say that's evidence of an actual plot, but I know a lot of people who aren't fond of Obummer, and vocally so, and own guns. Doesn't mean they're a threat (they also don't make death threats either, that I know of).
 
Last Edited:
Oddly enough when a (R) president comes in, the crazies will have immunity on threats against a president, in the name of free speech. Backed by the support of the aclu.
 

Upcoming Events

Rifle Mechanics
Sweet Home, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors May 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Handgun Self Defense Fundamentals
Sweet Home, OR
Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR

New Resource Reviews

Back Top