Platinum Supporter
Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 2,158
- Reactions
- 5,883
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Ann-Marie added that the only reason it was possible for a shooter 32 stories up and hundreds of yards away to fire a fatal shot is "the power of these weapons."
Nothing like starting from the position of complete ignorance, seasoned with a heaping helping of facebook level emotion
The plaintiffs know that the PLCAA shields these defendants. They know that the trial judge will probably dismiss the case soon. What they want is a chance to appeal the dismissal to appellate courts and prompt liberal appellate judges to expand the very few exceptions that are present in PLCAA or to use mental gymnastics to rule that PLCAA does not apply for some reason. They are trying to use litigation to change the law.
The plaintiffs know that the PLCAA shields these defendants. They know that the trial judge will probably dismiss the case soon. What they want is a chance to appeal the dismissal to appellate courts and prompt liberal appellate judges to expand the very few exceptions that are present in PLCAA or to use mental gymnastics to rule that PLCAA does not apply for some reason. They are trying to use litigation to change the law.
This, pure and simple, plus the extreme financial drain on an industry with a slim profit margin. I hope it goes to the USSC and backfires in their collective faces.
And they end up having to pay all legal fees
To all gun owners who were traumatized by the lawsuit......X3 for pain and suffering.