Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 16,282
- Reactions
- 34,592
"The relevant history affirms the principle that in 1791, as now, there was a tradition of regulating 'dangerous and unusual' weapons – specifically, those that are not reasonably necessary for self-defense," U.S. District Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV wrote in an order Thursday."
Excerpt from article.
Of course. Ar15s being "dangerous and unusual" is so dangerous, that there's over 24 million of them lawfully owned/possessed and used for lawful purposes
Can't wait to see SCOTUS smack them down again... especially since that same State was the one that essentially lost the Caetano case and where one of the SCOTUS Justices (Alito I believe)wrote that 20,000+ stun guns were "commonly possessed for lawful purposes" using Heller