Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 6,639
- Reactions
- 16,332
Parts of LA never fully recovered from what was already a distressed area. In the area of LA, I grew up in, we had three major markets that were reasonably walking distance from most parts or a short bus ride. After the riots there was one. That one changed hands several times."It's only a property crime."
Businesses don't want to put up any resistance to these flash mob robberies. Too much potential liability. Yet these kinds of things can only be ignored so long until there is no money to be made in the business. The nature of business is to make a profit of money. If that can't be done, then the business must close. Societies that live in high crime areas sometimes complain that they are underserved by business. And that somehow, this is a thing of discrimination. Yes, businesses are discriminating against these areas because they can't make money, or alternatively, they can't make money safely.
When you chase out the established businesses, you lose the grounds to complain, your area is being targeted or you're in some sort of food desert.
While not directly gun related, it is about violence and the long lasting results. It pushes everyone out to the nearest suburbs to do basic shopping and takes even more cash away from the local areas that need it most.
30 years later, the part of LA I grew up in is worse visually and socially than ever. Same complaints, same empty promises, same future for Oakland.
